<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Maryland Accident Law Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="Maryland Accident Law Blog" />
    <updated>2013-05-14T00:23:51Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Published By Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Baltimore to Pay $100k in School Bus Death Lawsuit</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/05/baltimore_to_pay_100k_in_schoo.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2441" title="Baltimore to Pay $100k in School Bus Death Lawsuit" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2441</id>
    
    <published>2013-05-13T13:42:05Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-14T00:23:51Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Last week, the City of Baltimore Board of Estimates voted unanimously to pay $100,000 as part of a settlement in a negligence lawsuit relating to the death of a young special needs boy who died after jumping from a school...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Injuries to Minors" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="school%20bus.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/school%20bus.jpg" width="350" height="236"align="left" />Last week, the City of Baltimore Board of Estimates <a href="http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2013-05-08/news/bs-md-ci-settlement-student-death-20130508_1_bus-driver-bus-company-m-r-hopkins-transportation" target="_blank">voted unanimously</a> to pay $100,000 as part of a settlement in a negligence lawsuit relating to the death of a young special needs boy who died after jumping from a school bus.  </p>

<p>The $100,000 settlement relates only to the allegations made against the city school system, who hired the bus company to transport the boy to and from school. The family has a separate claim against the bus company, an independent company.</p>

<p>The lawsuit alleges that school officials knew the boy struggled with "impulse control," and that he had a history of attempted exiting from the bus, yet proper procedures were not followed, and he was not restrained on the day of the fatal accident. He died just two days after the accident, as a result of the head injuries he sustained.</p>

<p>According to the suit, there were multiple prior incidents demonstrating the boy's behavior on the bus. These included the boy standing at the rear of the bus during the entire duration of the ride and, on a separate occasion, an attempted jump out the back door. </p>

<p>The lawsuit alleges that, on the day of the accident, the boy first attempted to open the front door of the bus, but the bus driver motioned at him with his hat, and continued to drive. The boy then allegedly walked past several aides, none of whom made any attempt to stop him, and then opened an emergency exit at the back of the bus, and jumped from four feet in the air into oncoming traffic. The bus driver continued driving, at a speed of 30 mph. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In addition to pointing out the lack of restraints, the suit also alleged that officials did not implement the boy's Individualized Education Plan, which required him to wear a safety vest on the bus. In accordance with the settlement, school officials admitted error, stating that this was an avoidable accident, and that officials knew the boy needed to be restrained on the bus, but that they failed to do so.</p>

<p>As the foregoing demonstrates, children can sustain injuries in any number of scenarios, which include dog bites, medical negligence or error, car accidents, swimming pool accidents, defective toys and even by prescription drug errors. In order to recover for injuries, all of these cases require proof that someone was negligent, and that their negligence was the cause of the child’s injuries. If a child’s representatives can establish negligence, the child is entitled to recover for his or her injuries. The child can also recover for any pain and suffering that accompanied those injuries. If the child is old enough to be employed or was employed at the time of the accident, the child can recover for his or her lost wages as a result of being injured.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, negligence and recklessness can cause more than just serious injury, such as alleged in this case. Sometimes, a death occurs. When a child dies due to the negligence or recklessness of another person or entity, the child’s parents may be entitled to recover for the loss of the child and the loss of the child’s love, affection, and companionship. This is known as a wrongful death case. Furthermore, if the child suffered following the injury until the moment of death, a case known as a survival action may also be brought.</p>

<p>If your child has injured or killed as a result of someone else's negligence, you should contact the experienced personal injury attorneys at Lebowitz & Mzhen, LLC. Our lawyers have extensive experience advocating on behalf of individuals and families who have suffered due to <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/wrongful-death.html">wrongful death</a> in Maryland. We have represented families who have lost loved ones as a result of wrongful deaths caused by auto accidents, hospital negligence, medical malpractice, and other traumatic events. If you believe that you have lost a loved one due to the negligent or wrongful actions of someone else, please contact us by calling 1-800-654-1949 or through our website in order to schedule your free initial consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/05/surgery_on_wrong_side_of_woman.html">Surgery on Wrong Side of Woman's Brain Prompts Malpractice Suit</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published May 3, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/maryland_man_dies_tragically_a_1.html">Maryland Man Dies Tragically at Tough Mudder Race</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published April 29, 2013</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Surgery on Wrong Side of Woman&apos;s Brain Prompts Malpractice Suit</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/05/surgery_on_wrong_side_of_woman.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2436" title="Surgery on Wrong Side of Woman's Brain Prompts Malpractice Suit" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2436</id>
    
    <published>2013-05-03T07:13:29Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-08T23:07:44Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A medical malpractice lawsuit was filed recently against a St. Lois hospital and neurosurgeon, by the family of a woman alleging that the defendants operated on the wrong side of her brain and skull. According to the complaint, the patient,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Medical Malpractice" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A medical malpractice lawsuit was filed recently against a St. Lois hospital and neurosurgeon, by the family of a woman <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/lawsuit-accuses-surgeon-of-operating-on-wrong-side-of-woman/article_cd2100bc-e56b-5981-9748-7c79af0bc430.html" target="_blank">alleging</a> that the defendants operated on the wrong side of her brain and skull. <img alt="files2.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/files2.jpg" width="350" height="262" align="right"/></p>

<p>According to the complaint, the patient, was scheduled for a “left-sided craniotomy bypass." Instead, the suit alleges, she received a “right-sided craniotomy surgical procedure." A second surgery was reportedly performed six days later on the correct side of the woman's skull following the discovery of the error. </p>

<p>According to her lawyer, the woman is now unable to speak intelligibly.</p>

<p>The suit alleges that the hospital and surgeon were negligent and careless, which led to the incorrect side surgery.</p>

<p>Specifically, the suit alleges that, “Before the incorrect surgery, plaintiff was mobile, cognizant and able to care for herself,” but after the allegedly botched job, “[she] requires around-the-clock care for her basic needs. ... (She) will also continue to suffer from emotional distress, anxiety, disfigurement and depression.”</p>

<p>The patient underwent the surgery because she suffered from a series of mini-strokes, and was hoping that the craniotomy bypass surgery would prevent future strokes. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to Maryland law, in order to win a medical malpractice case, the patient must demonstrate that the healthcare professional who treated them failed to meet the appropriate standard of care. A standard of care is defined as the generally accepted procedures and practices used by medical professionals  when treating patients with a particular disease or disorder, within the same geographic area. The standard of care can vary based upon a number of factors, which includes the patient's age and medical history. In addition to showing that the doctor or medical provider breached the standard of care, the patient must also show that this breach is responsible for causing their injuries.</p>

<p>In this case, based upon the facts set forth in the article, the alleged breach would be the fact that none of the healthcare professionals realized the error regarding which side of the brain was to be operated on. Unfortunately, while this case is shocking, it is not that uncommon. A recent study found that accidents such as this one, which are commonly referred to as "<a href="http://www.pharmacyerrorinjurylawyer.com/2013/03/surgical_never_events_occur_at_1.html">surgical never events," occur at least 4,000 times a year</a>. Whatever the particular error was in this case, assuming that the allegations are true, it seems clear that it was responsible for the subsequent surgery on the wrong side of the brain, which caused the plaintiff to suffer the injuries described. </p>

<p>If you or a loved one has been injured as a result of the negligent care of a physician, podiatrist, or other medical provider, you should seek the counsel of an experienced <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/medical-malpractice.html">medical malpractice attorney</a>. An attorney can help you identify all of the responsible parties, evaluate your claim, and develop a strategy to win compensation for your injuries. The attorneys at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing claims for people in Maryland injured due to the malpractice or negligence of medical professionals. Our knowledgeable and experienced attorneys will fight to secure the compensation you deserve. Contact us today online or by calling (800) 654-1949 in order to schedule a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/maryland_man_dies_tragically_a_1.html">Maryland Man Dies Tragically at Tough Mudder Race</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published April 29, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/school_district_to_pay_90_mill_1.html">School District to Pay $90 Million for Wrongful Death of 13-Year-Old</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published April 22, 2013</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Maryland Man Dies Tragically at Tough Mudder Race</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/maryland_man_dies_tragically_a_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2434" title="Maryland Man Dies Tragically at Tough Mudder Race" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2434</id>
    
    <published>2013-04-29T13:22:12Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-30T22:20:43Z</updated>
    
    <summary> With the warmer weather encouraging outdoor activities, many individuals are taking part in challenging races which as their hallmark involve obstacles, mud, or somehow getting dirty as part of the festivities. One of the most popular types of these...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Wrongful Death" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="obstacle.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/obstacle.jpg" width="350" height="262"align="left" /></p>

<p>With the warmer weather encouraging outdoor activities, many individuals are taking part in challenging races which as their hallmark involve obstacles, mud, or somehow getting dirty as part of the festivities. </p>

<p>One of the most popular types of these races, called the "Tough Mudder," describes itself as <br />
 “probably the toughest event on the planet.” It features ten to twelve <em>miles </em> of obstacle courses, and was initially designed by a former counterterrorism agent for the British government. Typical obstacles include a slicked half-pipe that participants have to scale, and an obstacle where runners must traverse through live wires. Participants are not required to complete every obstacle in the race.</p>

<p>A recent Tough Mudder event in West Virginia resulted in the <a href="http://www.washingtonian.com/blogs/wellbeing/fitness/maryland-man-dies-during-tough-mudder-race.php" target="_blank">tragic death</a> of a local 28-year-old man. According to witnesses, the man never resurfaced after jumping into ice cold water during the Walk the Plank obstacle. Friends who were also present at the race, reported that it took four to seven minutes for authorities to get to him. The race had some 75 medical professionals on duty that day. While medics were able to resuscitate him at the scene of the course, he was later flown to a local hospital, and died after being taken off of life support. According to the local medical examiner, the cause of death was accidental drowning.</p>

<p>Representatives of the race released a statement saying that they were “devastated” by the incident, and that they are fully cooperating with local law enforcement authorities. They also stated that this is the first death in the three year history of the company.</p>

<p>According to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/24/avishek-sengupta-tough-mudder_n_3144759.html" target="_blank">other sources</a>, this specific race was particularly affected by injuries. One hospital reportedly became so overwhelmed with patients injured on the obstacle course that it actually had to turn people away from its emergency room. It has been reported that two participants suffered heart attacks, ten had hypothermia, head injuries, or orthopedic injuries, and one other individual was treated for drowning. The hospital reported taking in a total of 20 patients over the weekend that the event occurred. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>It is standard practice in races, including those that involve a potentially increased chance of harm, to require participants to sign a liability waiver, stating that they assume the risk for any injuries that they might suffer as a result of participating.</p>

<p>However, even though individuals are required to sign these waivers, that doesn't necessarily mean that they are precluded from a legal claim against the race organizers should an injury occur. In cases where injury or death was the result of negligence on behalf of the race's employees, the injury was caused due to unreasonable risks, or involved those who were not covered within the waiver's general language, individuals and their families may be able to bring a legal claim to recover compensation for their injuries or loss.</p>

<p>If you or someone you know has been injured by participating in a race or other organized event in Maryland, you should contact the experienced personal injury attorneys at Lebowitz & Mzhen, LLC. Our lawyers have extensive experience advocating on behalf of individuals and families who have suffered due to <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/wrongful-death.html">wrongful death</a> in Maryland. We have represented families who have lost loved ones as a result of wrongful deaths caused by auto accidents, hospital negligence, medical malpractice, and other traumatic events. If you believe that you have lost a loved one due to the negligent or wrongful actions of someone else, please contact us by calling 1-800-654-1949 or through our website in order to schedule your free initial consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/school_district_to_pay_90_mill_1.html">School District to Pay $90 Million for Wrongful Death of 13-Year-Old</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published April 22, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/3_year_old_killed_in_maryland.html">3 Year Old Killed in Maryland Garage Door Accident</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published  April 15, 2013</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>School District to Pay $90 Million for Wrongful Death of 13-Year-Old</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/school_district_to_pay_90_mill_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2428" title="School District to Pay $90 Million for Wrongful Death of 13-Year-Old" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2428</id>
    
    <published>2013-04-22T14:26:37Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-26T04:22:36Z</updated>
    
    <summary>According to news reports, last week a Maryland jury awarded $90 million to a family who lost their 13-year-old daughter 4 years ago. The wrongful death verdict, reached by a jury of six, is one of the largest in the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Wrongful Death" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.autoworldnews.com/articles/3702/20130417/family-awarded-90m-daughter-s-death-maryland-car-accident-trending-news-video.htm"target="_blank">According to news reports</a>, last week a Maryland jury awarded $90 million to a family who lost their 13-year-old daughter 4 years ago. The wrongful death verdict, reached by a jury of six, is one of the largest in the court's history.<img alt="pedestrian%20light.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/pedestrian%20light.jpg" width="350" height="232" align="right"/></p>

<p>The girl was struck by a Lincoln Continental when she was crossing Brinkley Road near Fisher Road in Temple Hills.  The driver then hit another vehicle, as well as another young pedestrian who was walking on the other side of the street. The family sued the Prince George’s County Board of Education, where the girl was a freshman student,  two weeks after the September 2009 crash, when she died as a result of her injuries.</p>

<p>The family alleged that the school system did not provide a safe bus stop for students, and further that the bus driver “persistently negligently failed to stop at the appropriate stop,” which resulted in the girl trying to ride a different school bus on the other side of the street. This meant she had to cross the street in order to be picked up.</p>

<p>Apparently parents in the district have expressed their concern for years regarding unsafe routes and late school buses. In some cases, due to budget cuts children are expected to walk 1-1.5 miles to school due to lack of busing services.  </p>

<p>The school is expected to appeal the decision.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Under Maryland law, the Maryland Wrongful Death Statute governs wrongful death lawsuits. This type of claim, like the one brought by the young girl's family, is pursued by the decedent's surviving relatives. The lawsuit is intended to compensate the loved ones for the loss of the victim's life and the love, companionship, etc., they would have had if the other party's actions had not led to the loved one's death. Only specific family members are allowed to file a wrongful death lawsuit. Maryland law is different than in many other states because there is no limit on the amount of economic damages that a court can award in a wrongful death action, which is possibly why the award in this case was so high. However, there is a limit for non-economic damages, which includes items such as loss of companionship.</p>

<p>The personal injury lawyers at Lebowitz & Mzhen, LLC have many years of experience working with individuals and families who have suffered due to <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063430.html"target="_blank">wrongful death in Maryland</a>. We have represented families who have lost loved ones as a result of wrongful deaths caused by hospital negligence, medical malpractice, auto accidents, and other traumatic events. If you believe that you have lost a loved one due to the negligent or wrongful actions of someone else, please contact us through our website or at 1-800-654-1949 for a no-cost consultation.</p>

<p><br />
<strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/3_year_old_killed_in_maryland.html">3 Year Old Killed in Maryland Garage Door Accident</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published April 15, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/man_receives_10_year_sentence_1.html">Man Receives 10 Year Sentence For Deadly DUI in Potential Wrongful Death Case</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published April 8, 2013</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>3 Year Old Killed in Maryland Garage Door Accident</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/3_year_old_killed_in_maryland.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2424" title="3 Year Old Killed in Maryland Garage Door Accident" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2424</id>
    
    <published>2013-04-15T13:17:50Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-17T22:26:52Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A terrible garage door accident led to the accidental killing of a 3 year old girl in Maryland earlier this month. The girl was apparently left unattended for a short period of time, during which it is believed that she...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Wrongful Death" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A terrible garage door accident led to the accidental killing of a 3 year old girl in Maryland <a href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/3-year-old-killed-by-garage-door-toddler-killed-in-tragic-accident-in-maryland-93379/" target="_blank">earlier this month</a>. <br />
<img alt="dandelion.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/dandelion.jpg" width="350" height="331"align="left" /></p>

<p>The girl was apparently left unattended for a short period of time, during which it is believed that she began playing around with the remote control for the garage door. It is being speculated that she was opening and closing the door repeatedly when she eventually somehow became trapped under it as it came down on top of her. </p>

<p>When the mother found her the little girl she was still alive, although pinned under the door. Emergency services were called immediately, and the girl was transported to a local hospital, but tragically, she later died of the injuries she had suffered. It is believed that the little girl died from asphyxiation.</p>

<p>Police have confirmed that there has been no indication of foul play, and are accordingly treating the death as a tragic accident, and are investigating the circumstances of the death. Specifically, they suspect a malfunction with the sensors on the door, which are designed to stop the motor should anything be detected under the door. The door was reportedly one that was equipped with sensors that should have stopped before hitting or crushing anything. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is an incredibly sad and tragic case. The whole reason for having sensors in automatic garage doors is so that senseless tragedies like this are prevented from occurring. There are several different legal doctrines that can come into play here. If authorities do determine that the garage door was not properly working, the family may have a products liability claim against the manufacturer for the malfunction. However, more likely, because the little girl died as a result of the malfunction, there is a strong possibility that the company may be liable for under a wrongful death cause of action. </p>

<p>Wrongful death claims are intended to attempt to reimburse families for the loss of their loved one. The purpose is to make the families whole or, in other words, put them into the position they would have been if the other party's negligence hadn't caused the death. In cases as tragic as this one, it's clear that no amount of money will ever make the family whole. However, pursuing a claim against the company who may have been responsible for the malfunction may give the family at least some sense of justice, and may also serve the purpose of creating an incentive for companies to make sure these sorts of things never happen again.</p>

<p>If you or someone you know has been injured by a defective product, or if someone you loved died because of exposure to or use of a defective or dangerous product or substance, you should speak with a <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064348.html">Maryland products liability attorney</a> right away. The attorneys at Lebowitz & Mzhen will work to secure the recovery that you deserve. Contact us today at 1-800-654-1949 or through our website to schedule your complimentary and confidential initial consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/man_receives_10_year_sentence_1.html">Man Receives 10 Year Sentence For Deadly DUI in Potential Wrongful Death Case</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published April 8, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/03/tragic_maryland_heights_mine_c_1.html">Tragic Maryland Heights Mine Collapse Kills Employee</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published March 27, 2013</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Man Receives 10 Year Sentence For Deadly DUI in Potential Wrongful Death Case </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/04/man_receives_10_year_sentence_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2419" title="Man Receives 10 Year Sentence For Deadly DUI in Potential Wrongful Death Case " />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2419</id>
    
    <published>2013-04-08T13:32:25Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-09T05:39:52Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Last week a Missouri man received a heavy sentence for his role in a tragic car accident that he allegedly caused in September of 2011. He received a sentence of 10 years in prison for his role in the DWI...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Car Accidents" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last week a Missouri man <a href="http://marylandheights.patch.com/articles/walsh-sentenced-to-10-years-for-manslaughter-in-dwi-collision" target="_blank">received </a>a heavy sentence for his role in a tragic car accident that he allegedly caused in September of 2011.  He received a sentence of 10 years in prison for his role in the DWI crash that killed two people and injured five. The defendant pleaded guilty in November to  the charges, which included two counts of involuntary manslaughter and five counts of second-degree assault.<br />
<img alt="lotus.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/lotus.jpg" width="350" height="262"align="right" /></p>

<p>Based on the evidence at the scene and witness accounts, the police estimate that the man was driving nearly 100 miles per hour when the collision occurred. His car rear ended the Chevy Tahoe, containing the two men and other passengers, which caused the Tahoe to flip over several times.</p>

<p>He received a 10 year sentence for each count of involuntary manslaughter and seven years for each of the five counts of second-degree assault. The 17 months which he has already served in jail will be counted as time served, and all of the sentences will be served concurrently. </p>

<p>The assistant prosecuting attorney in the case said that 10 years was the heaviest sentence he had ever seen in a DWI and involuntary manslaughter case, adding that, “Part of it was that he had a prior DWI, and the fact that he killed two people and injured five." He also stated that under Missouri law, the man must serve at least 85 percent of his sentence before becoming eligible for parole.</p>

<p>Although the outcome in this particular case addresses the sentencing reached as a result of the criminal justice system, the families in this case also likely have <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063430.html">wrongful death</a> claims against the driver in this tragic car accident.  <br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the state of Maryland, for example, the Maryland Wrongful Death Statute governs wrongful death claims. This type of lawsuit is brought by the victim's surviving family members on their own behalf. The claim seeks to compensate the family members of the loss of the victim's life and his or her companionship, love, and future financial support that the family would have continued to receive, had the other party not wrongfully caused the loved one's death. Only certain family members are permitted to file a wrongful death lawsuit. Maryland law is somewhat unique in that there is no statutory cap on the amount of economic damages that can be awarded in a wrongful death suit. However, there is a cap for non-economic damages, which includes those factors such as loss of companionship.</p>

<p>The personal injury law firm of Lebowitz & Mzhen, LLC has many years of experience in working with individuals and families who have suffered because of the wrongful death of a loved one. We have represented families who have lost loved ones as a result of wrongful deaths caused by medical malpractice, hospital negligence, car accidents, and other traumatic events. If you believe that your loved one died because of the wrongful or negligent actions of another, please contact us at 1-800-654-1949 or through our website for a free consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/03/tragic_maryland_heights_mine_c_1.html">Tragic Maryland Heights Mine Collapse Kills Employee</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published March 27, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/03/maryland_legislators_debate_la.html">Maryland Legislators Debate Law That Would Help Dog Bite Victims</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published March 22, 2013</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Tragic Maryland Heights Mine Collapse Kills Employee</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/03/tragic_maryland_heights_mine_c_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2403" title="Tragic Maryland Heights Mine Collapse Kills Employee" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2403</id>
    
    <published>2013-03-27T15:15:17Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-29T17:57:09Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A 61-year-old man was involved in a tragic accident that occurred at the Fred Weber rock quarry in Maryland Heights Missouri last Wednesday, which left the man dead. He was a 24-year veteran with the company. According to reports, at...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Construction Accidents" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="rocks.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/rocks.jpg" width="350" height="262" align="left" />A 61-year-old man was involved in a <a href="http://stcharles.patch.com/articles/st-charles-man-killed-in-maryland-heights-quarry-accident" target="_blank">tragic accident</a> that occurred at the Fred Weber rock quarry in Maryland Heights Missouri last Wednesday, which left the man dead. He was a 24-year veteran with the company. </p>

<p>According to reports, at around 5 p.m. on Wednesday March 27, a routine rock-blasting operation caused an accident in the north quarry which resulted in a major rock slide, trapping the man below many tons of rock. <a href="http://www.kmov.com/news/local/Police-Crews-respond-to-industrial-accident-at-Fred-Weber-Quarry--200320391.html" target="_blank">Video footage</a> shows the immense amount of rock that came crashing down.</p>

<p>According to a spokesperson for the company, the man was confirmed to have been killed by a routine rock blasting operation, when he was buried under several tons of rock. </p>

<p>Shortly after the accident occurred, EMS arrived on the scene to try and rescue the man, and fire crews were present to investigate the cause of the accident. Fred Weber Inc. said in a statement that it had notified the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), and that it plans to cooperate fully with their investigation. </p>

<p>Accidents such as this one are not uncommon in construction site and related activities. These types of practices are considered ultrahazardous because they carry such a high associated risk. While not all construction site jobs pose as much danger as in this case, because of the nature of the work, there is still a great potential for workers to suffer from a personal injury or wrongful death.  </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>While this tragedy involved the use of explosives resulting in a rock slide, falls remain the number one cause of construction worker-related fatalities.</p>

<p>Other common causes of construction injuries and deaths include:<ul><li>Scaffolding accidents</li><li>Electric shock</li><li>Explosions</li><li>Fires</li><li>Compressed gases accidents</li><li>Welding accidents</li><li>Machinery accidents</li><li>Trench collapses</li><li>Motor vehicle-related injuries</li><li>Being hit by falling or heavy equipment or materials</li></ul><br />
Although workers on construction sites and their representatives may not be able to sue their employers for work-related injuries directly, they may be entitled to receive workers compensation benefits for injuries, lost wages, medical expenses, disability, or any resulting death. Additionally, if a third-party aside from the employer was responsible for causing the accident, the injured party may be able to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit against that person or entity.</p>

<p>If you or a loved one have been injured or killed as a result of a construction accident in the  Maryland or Washington D.C. area, contact the experienced <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063418.html">Maryland personal injury attorneys</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen. We have many years of experienced advocating on behalf of victims and families of these construction site accidents. We are dedicated to zealously representing you, and making sure that you receive the compensation you deserve. We take cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning that we don't recover until you do. Contact us today in order to schedule your free initial consultation. You can reach us through our website, or by calling 1-800-654-1949 today.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/03/controversy_surrounds_proposed_1.html">Controversy Surrounds Proposed Legislation in Maryland Requiring Warnings for Old Tires</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published March 19, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/02/80000_settlement_for_3_year_ol.html">$80,000 Settlement for 3 Year Old Girl Who Fell out of Ride</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published February 19, 2013</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Maryland Legislators Debate Law That Would Help Dog Bite Victims</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/03/maryland_legislators_debate_la.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2392" title="Maryland Legislators Debate Law That Would Help Dog Bite Victims" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2392</id>
    
    <published>2013-03-22T17:30:15Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-29T05:46:09Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Towards the end of last month, Maryland legislators began the process of passing a bill to address whether or not pit bulls should continue to be singled out as inherently aggressive, thus impacting the potential liability that their owners face...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Dog Bite/Attack" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Towards the end of last month, Maryland legislators began the process of <a href="http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/1096886" target="_blank">passing a bill</a> to address whether or not pit bulls should continue to be singled out as inherently aggressive, thus impacting the potential liability that their owners face in a lawsuit. Last year, Maryland's highest court, the Court of Appeals, ruled that pit bulls are dangerous by nature, a move that has angered some pit bull lovers and activists.</p>

<p><img alt="pit%20bull.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/pit%20bull.jpg" width="350" height="233" align="right"/>According to the terms of the<a href="http://www.abc2news.com/dpp/news/state/pit-bull-bill-to-be-debated-in-annapolis" target="_blank">bill </a>all dogs would be considered inherently dangerous. If passed, a victim of a dog bite, regardless of breed, could sue the dog's owner. Thus, the bill acts as a sort <a href="http://www.abc2news.com/dpp/news/state/md-lawmakers-take-on-pit-bull-ruling" target="_blank">redefinition</a> of the Court of Appeals' decision, which ruled that pit bull owners and landlords would be held to strict liability standards for dog bites. Strict liability, in this context, means the owner would be liable without any additional evidence prior to the attack that a dog was dangerous. The new law thus creates the presumption that all dog owners, regardless of the breed, are presumed liable for attacks. </p>

<p>The law has run into some <a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-03- 12/local/37646838_1_dog-bites-dog-owners-pit-bulls" target="_blank">complications</a>. The Senate took up a separate version of the bill that included a new provision requiring dog owners to  provide “clear and convincing” evidence that their dog was not dangerous before the attack in order to prevail. Critics of this version argue that dog owners will be virtually incapable of rebutting a claim because the standard of proof is so high.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The general rule regarding dog bites is sometimes referred to as the "first bite free" rule. This implies that because the dog has never bitten anyone before, it was not predictable or preventable. Therefore, there has to be some sort of evidence of negligence on the owner's part in order for him or her to be held liable for the bite. This lies in stark contrast to a strict liability rule, meaning certain liability regardless of prior behaviors for inherently dangerous animals, e.g. a tiger.</p>

<p>Let us be clear though, dog owners are always liable for the actions of their dog. The clarification is that under the new rules, dogs would be automatically considered inherently dangerous, thus lowering the burden of proof for victims, and shifting the onus onto the owner to prove that the attack wasn't foreseeable, etc. </p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063440.html">dog bite lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen, LLC, have successfully represented many individuals who have sustained neurological injuries, permanent scarring, and other serious injuries from being bitten or attacked by a dog. If you or a loved one has been injured or attacked by a dog in Maryland, Washington D.C., or the surrounding areas,  please contact our dedicated attorneys today in order to set up your free, no obligation initial consultation. You can reach us by calling 1-800-654-1949 or through our website.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/03/controversy_surrounds_proposed_1.html">Controversy Surrounds Proposed Legislation in Maryland Requiring Warnings for Old Tires</a> Maryland Accident Law Blog, published March 19, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/03/maryland_man_killed_in_atv_acc_1.html">Maryland Man Killed in ATV Accident</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published March 5, 2013</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Controversy Surrounds Proposed Legislation in Maryland Requiring Warnings for Old Tires</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/03/controversy_surrounds_proposed_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2368" title="Controversy Surrounds Proposed Legislation in Maryland Requiring Warnings for Old Tires" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2368</id>
    
    <published>2013-03-19T06:35:38Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-20T18:57:16Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Maryland House Committee on Economic Matters held a hearing March 13 in order to discuss a proposed tire aging bill. The proposed Maryland House Bill 1110 is controversial because it would require businesses that sell tires to provide customers...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Maryland Legislation" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Maryland House Committee on Economic Matters held a hearing March 13 in order to discuss a proposed tire aging bill. The proposed Maryland House Bill 1110 is <a href="http://www.tirebusiness.com/article/20130315/NEWS/130319956/heated-debate-on-proposed-md-tire-age-bill" target="_blank">controversial</a> because it would require businesses that sell tires to provide customers with pamphlets or other printed handouts containing statements regarding the potential dangers that can occur as tires age.</p>

<p><img alt="old%20tires.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/old%20tires.jpg" width="262" height="350" align="left"/></p>

<p><br />
The new law would require merchants to provide this information whenever they sell a tire that is:</p>

<ul>
<li> used; </li>
<li> recycled; </li>
<li> retreaded; or</li>
<li> more than three years past its manufacture date</li>
</ul>

<p>Failure to do so could result in fines of up to $250 per violation. The currently proposed legislation would additionally make violations of the law inadmissible in personal injury lawsuits. The extent of this limitation is not clear, but probably means that a mere violation is not conclusive evidence of fault. <br />
 <br />
A more inclusive version of the bill was introduced by the same sponsor, Benjamin F. Kramer, last year. The prior version would have required all tire manufacturers and retailers within Maryland to inform customers of the age of <em>every tire</em> that they sold. </p>

<p>That version of the law never made it out of the committee, due to unanimous opposition from the Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA), the Tire Industry Association (TIA), and the Chesapeake Automotive Business Association (CABA).<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>At the hearing, tire industry officials stated that their research does not show correlation between a tire's chronological age and its tendency to fail. A representative emphasized that a tire's condition is largely based on how it's stored, i.e. in an indoor ventilated area versus outside in the heat. Several tire industry members further testified that they felt the law would create an unnecessary burden and resulting inventory nightmare. </p>

<p>Because they are a consumer good, injuries or other damage caused by tires would likely be pursued under a products liability cause of action. There are various types of products liability claims, and these include negligence, breach of warranty, and strict liability. Generally speaking, manufacturers owe a certain duty of care to their potential future customers in the way that they design, manufacture, and inspect products prior to offering them for sale or use by consumers. Manufacturers are also required to warn the consumer of any foreseeable dangerous conditions associated with the product or foreseeable misuses of the product. The failure to warn or defectiveness of a product is probably the most applicable to any potential lawsuits that might arise out of defective or otherwise dangerous tires. </p>

<p>If you or someone you know has been injured or died because of a defective product or substance, or been exposed to a dangerous substance, you should speak with a qualified Maryland products liability attorney immediately. You have protections under the law, and you may be entitled to compensation for your pain and suffering, medical bills, lost wages, or similar damages. The experienced <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064348.html">products liability attorneys</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen, LLC will work with you to timely file your product liability claim, and to secure the recovery that you deserve. Contact us today at 1-800-654-1949 or through our website to schedule your free and confidential initial consultation.</p>

<p><br />
<strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/03/maryland_man_killed_in_atv_acc_1.html">Maryland Man Killed in ATV Accident</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published March 5, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/02/toyota_to_pay_29_million_in_sa.html">Toyota to Pay $29 Million in Safety Settlement</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published February 26, 2013</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Maryland Man Killed in ATV Accident</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/03/maryland_man_killed_in_atv_acc_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2356" title="Maryland Man Killed in ATV Accident" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2356</id>
    
    <published>2013-03-05T15:57:56Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-07T21:27:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A 29-year-old Maryland man was tragically killed last week when he was ejected suddenly from the all-terrain vehicle he was riding and hit a concrete barrier It happened last Wednesday evening, on West Road in Salisbury. According to police, the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Personal Injury" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A 29-year-old Maryland man was <a href="http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Maryland-Man-Killed-in-ATV-Accident-194164541.html"target="_blank">tragically killed last week</a> when he was  ejected suddenly from the all-terrain vehicle he was riding and hit a concrete barrier </p>

<p><img alt="ATV%20driver.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/ATV%20driver.jpg" width="350" height="233" align="left" style="margin-right: 8px;" /></p>

<p>It happened last Wednesday evening, on West Road in Salisbury. According to police, the man was operating a 2004 Suzuki Quad runner four-wheel drive quad on the roadway at a high rate of speed when he suddenly lost control. The ATV apparently steered off of the road, traveling across uneven pavement, which caused both the man and the ATV to hit a concrete barrier. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.delmarvanow.com/article/20130301/WIC01/303010017/"target="_blank">Authorities say</a> the man, who was not wearing a helmet or any other safety equipment, died at a local hospital of his injuries. Alcohol was not involved in the accident.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>This tragic case is an example of how dangerous these all terrain vehicles can be. According to at least one report, 700 people are killed every year from ATV related accidents, and another 136,000 are sent to the emergency room. </p>

<p>Additionally, ATVs post an even greater threat to children. In 2010 at least 55 kids younger than 16 were killed, and more than 28,000 were seriously injured in ATV accidents. The American Academy of Pediatrics has warned that ATVs are dangerous for children. </p>

<p>Due to the dangers posed, industry players are advising ATV riders to follow safety measures such as:<ul><br />
<li> wear a helmet </li><br />
<li> never ride with a passenger</li><br />
<li> never ride on a public road </li><br />
<li> one size ATV does not fit all </li></ul><br />
The facts reported in relation with this case are limited, therefore it remains unclear whether there are any legal issues involved, or rather it was just a tragic accident that was a result of travelling too quickly over rugged terrain.</p>

<p>Sometimes, in situations such as this, there is more at play. For example, a minor rides an ATV without parental permission, or without proper safety equipment. Alternatively, a person rides an ATV over unsafe terrain. In either of these cases, the landowner and ATV owner may be liable for the resulting death or injuries caused. </p>

<p>If you or a loved one has been hurt or killed as a result of an ATV accident, whether you are a Maryland resident or someone from outside the state, our <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063430.html">wrongful death lawyers</a> and personal injury lawyers may be able to help. Even if the relevant police reports state that you or your loved one caused the accident, there may be evidence that indicates otherwise. If so, you may be entitled to pursue a legal claim for your personal injury or wrongful death.</p>

<p>Lebowitz & Mzhen, LLC is a well established full service personal injury law firm. As experienced attorneys, we have represented many families who have suffered from wrongful deaths caused by ATV accidents, car accidents, and other traumatic events. If you believe that your loved one died because of the wrongful or negligent actions of another, please contact us through our website, or by calling 1-800-654-1949 today in order to schedule your confidential and free initial consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/01/cruise_industry_adopts_new_saf.html">Cruise Industry Adopts New Safety Standards After 2012 Cruise Ship Crash</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published January 28, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/08/lawsuit_alleges_prison_nurse_d_1.html">Lawsuit Alleges Prison Nurse Denied Emergency Medical Care to Inmate</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published August 7, 2013</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Toyota to Pay $29 Million in Safety Settlement</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/02/toyota_to_pay_29_million_in_sa.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2346" title="Toyota to Pay $29 Million in Safety Settlement" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2346</id>
    
    <published>2013-02-26T16:09:45Z</published>
    <updated>2013-02-28T21:34:33Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Toyota announced earlier this month that it will pay some $29 million to 29 states (including Maryland) and American Samoa as part of its settlement related to safety recalls. The settlement is in response to the lawsuits filed in 2010...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Products Liability" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Toyota announced earlier this month that<a href="http://www.theadvertiser.com/viewart/20130214/BUSINESS/130214028/Toyota-pays-29M-states-settle-safety-suit-"target="_blank"> it will pay some $29 million to 29 states</a> (including <img alt="interstate%20sign.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/interstate%20sign.jpg" width="186" height="350"align="right" />Maryland) and American Samoa as part of its settlement related to safety recalls. The settlement is in response to the lawsuits filed in 2010 (by several state attorney generals), following in the wake of the global recall of 14 million vehicles which accelerated without notice. The lawsuit accused Toyota of failing to notify customers promptly about the problems.</p>

<p>Results of the investigation revealed a lack of communication between Toyota's Japan and U.S. offices. Toyota has agreed to address communication lapses, post additional information for consumers on its website, and reimburse costs for certain owners related to having their cars repaired. </p>

<p>Toyota and The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration agree that the problem is likely sticky gas pedals, faulty floor mats and driver error rather than an electrical issue. So far, the car maker has paid more than $1 billion to settle claims related to the recalls, including a record $17.4 million fine to the U.S. government for failing to quickly report safety problems. </p>

<p>In addition to this settlement, Toyota has also <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2013/01/18/toyota-settles-first-hundreds-wrongful-death-suits-involving-unintended/"target="_blank">begun to settle</a> the various Wrongful Death lawsuits associated with its defective cars. <br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In 2010, it settled perhaps the most well known example of the defect, where a former CHP officer and three of his family members were killed after their car reached speeds upwards of 120 mph, hit an SUV, then launched off of an embankment, rolling several times and then burst into flames. Investigations into the accident determined that incorrectly sized floor mats had forced the accelerator down, causing the crash. </p>

<p>There are several different sorts of legal doctrines that come into play here. First of all, Toyota is liable to customers for its defective cars both in terms of the products potentially being considered "lemons," but also for any personal injury claims which may have resulted. Secondly, in the cases where people were hurt, or killed, Toyota might be liable for the wrongful death claims, such as in the San Diego case. Manufacturers owe a duty to their customers to ensure that their products are not inherently dangerous. If you have one of the defective Toyota models, you should speak with a products liability attorney to determine if you have a claim against Toyota. There is a statute of limitations, so you'll want to act quickly. </p>

<p>If you or someone you know has been injured by a <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064348.html">defective product</a>, or if someone you loved died because of exposure to or use of a defective or dangerous product or substance, you should speak with a Maryland products liability attorney right away. The attorneys at Lebowitz & Mzhen, will work to secure the recovery that you deserve. Contact us today at 1-800-654-1949 or through our website to schedule your complimentary and confidential initial consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/01/cruise_industry_adopts_new_saf.html">Cruise Industry Adopts New Safety Standards After 2012 Cruise Ship Crash</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published January 28, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/12/fathers_wrongful_death_lawsuit_1.html">Father's Wrongful Death Lawsuit for Daughter Finally Makes It to Trial, but Jury Rules that Defendant Was Not Negligent: Tollenger v. State of Maryland, et al</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published December 6, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/11/insurance_companies_ask_court.html">Insurance Companies Ask Court to Declare They Are Not Obligated to Defend Four Loko Manufacturer in Products Liability Lawsuits: Netherlands Ins. Co. v. Phusion Projects, Inc.</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published November 30, 2012</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>$80,000 Settlement for 3 Year Old Girl Who Fell out of Ride</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/02/80000_settlement_for_3_year_ol.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2339" title="$80,000 Settlement for 3 Year Old Girl Who Fell out of Ride" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2339</id>
    
    <published>2013-02-19T06:28:54Z</published>
    <updated>2013-02-27T19:27:50Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo carnival reportedly reached a settlement this month, with the family of a three year old girl who was violently thrown from one of the carnival rides last year. The girl was on the ride...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Amusement Park Accidents" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo carnival <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=8992192" target="_blank"> reportedly reached a settlement</a> this <img alt="roller%20coaster.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/roller%20coaster.jpg" width="360" height="120" align="left" />month, with the family of a three year old girl who was violently thrown from one of the carnival rides last year. The girl was on the ride "Techno Jump" with her eight year old brother, when she somehow slipped under the restraint bar and fell some 6-8 feet to the ground. She sustained a concussion and some other minor injuries. The girl was apparently tall for her age, meeting the minimum height requirement for the ride.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=8891507" target="_blank">lawsuit, against the owner of the Rodeo, Ray Cammack Shows, Inc. was filed last November,</a> claiming negligence.</p>

<p>The child's mother, Shanjea Pennygraph, <a href="http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Mother-of-girl-thrown-from-rodeo-carnival-ride-4051610.php" target="_blank">sought damages</a> for <br />
relevant medical care, medical expenses, physical pain and past and present emotional distress. The filing also sought compensation for current and potential physical injuries. The Pennygraph family is reported to receive nearly $80,000 from the settlement. </p>

<p>This incident has allegedly prompted rodeo officials to revise guidelines for 16 of its amusements, which include the Techno Jump. The new guidelines revise the requirements for  children not tall enough to ride alone. Children under a certain height may only ride if they have a "supervising companion" whom is at least sixteen years old.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Carnival safety has been under increased scrutiny following the tragic death of 47-year-old Brian Greenhouse, who fell from the Hi Miler roller coaster during the <em>same</em>rodeo held in 2011. <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=8630337" target="_blank">Greenhouse's case settled last April</a>. While Ray Cammack Shows admitted no liability, Greenhouse's 7 year old son received $1.9 million in annuities, which guarantee at least $2.9 million in benefits. Additionally, the man's parents were expected to secure $372,500 each in separate claims.</p>

<p>Injuries sustained while at an amusement park can have more than one legal component. This is because they can implicate both personal injury theories, such as negligence of the ride operator, but can also implicate fault of the property owner, such as poorly maintained rides. This is based on a theory that landowners owe a duty of care to visitors, and that duty encompasses a duty to maintain the land and inspect it to ensure that it is free from unreasonable dangers. </p>

<p>What is additionally interesting about this case in particular, is that it involved a fall out of a ride at the same rodeo in which a man had died the year prior. The man's family had also sued the rodeo, meaning there was no way it was not on notice of the potentially negligent or dangerous conditions present. It is upsetting to think that this poor girl's injuries could have been prevented. Hopefully the rodeo's improved safety measures and guidelines will prevent anyone else from falling out of rides and getting hurt. </p>

<p>If you or your <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064340.html">child was injured</a> as a result of negligent ride operation, Maryland accident attorneys can help you identify the responsible parties and get the compensation you deserve. </p>

<p>The injury attorneys at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people in Maryland who have been injured as a result of dangerous amusement park conditions or poorly maintained rides. We also handle cases involving other types of personal injury, including car accidents, medical malpractice, and defective products. You can contact us through using our online contact form, or by calling (800) 654-1949, for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts</strong>:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/02/parents_of_7_yearold_file_noti_1.html">Parents of 7 Year-Old File Notice of Intent to Sue Police for Allegedly Handcuffing, Interrogating Child for 10 Hours</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published February 11, 2013</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/01/mother_of_man_allegedly_killed.html">Mother of Man Allegedly Killed by Store Employee Sues for Battery</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, published January 25, 2013</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Parents of 7 Year-Old File Notice of Intent to Sue Police for Allegedly Handcuffing, Interrogating Child for 10 Hours</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/02/parents_of_7_yearold_file_noti_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2332" title="Parents of 7 Year-Old File Notice of Intent to Sue Police for Allegedly Handcuffing, Interrogating Child for 10 Hours" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2332</id>
    
    <published>2013-02-11T17:33:13Z</published>
    <updated>2013-02-13T01:44:07Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The parents of a seven year-old Bronx boy filed a notice of a claim against the New York City Police Department for $250 million. Another student at their son’s elementary school accused the boy of stealing five dollars from him,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Injuries to Minors" />
            <category term="Police Brutality" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="file0001127388145.jpg" title="drowninsanity from morguefile.com" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/file0001127388145.jpg" align="right" width="300" height="225" />The parents of a seven year-old Bronx boy filed a <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/bronx/boy-cuffed-held-kid-money-article-1.1250928" title="Bronx boy Wilson Reyes, 7, cuffed for hours in police precinct after swiping another kid's money" target="_blank">notice of a claim against the New York City Police Department</a> for $250 million. Another student at their son’s elementary school accused the boy of stealing five dollars from him, and the parents allege that the police drastically overreacted by <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/cops_are_cuff_guys_with_kid_eaRQ39892kXQndMJkDgY9J" title="Cops handcuff and interrogate boy, 7, for hours over missing $5: family" target="_blank">detaining him for ten hours</a>. The claim, filed with city officials, is a required step prior to filing a lawsuit for damages against the city.</p>

<p>Police say that they <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/30/wilson-reyes-7-year-old-boy-nypd-handcuffed_n_2581544.html" title="Wilson Reyes, 7-Year-Old Boy, Handcuffed By NYPD For Hours Over Five Dollars" target="_blank">responded to a report of a robbery and assault</a> at PS X114 in the Bronx at around 10:20 a.m. on December 4, 2012, four days after the alleged offense occurred. The child claiming to be the victim of the robbery, a nine year-old whom we shall refer to as A., alleged that another boy, seven year-old W., punched and shoved him, then <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/family-year-nyc-boy-handcuffed-18357584" title="Family: 7-Year-Old NYC Boy Handcuffed Over $5" target="_blank">took five dollars</a> out of his pocket. This occurred off school grounds. A. described W. to the media as “the worst bully,” claiming that W. routinely harassed him. W. denied A.’s allegations, saying that the money had fallen to the ground, and that another boy picked it up. W.’s family alleged that another boy later admitted to the theft.</p>

<p>Instead of sending W. to the principal’s office, the school called the police, who allegedly pulled W. out of class and detained him at the school for about four hours. They then took W. to the 44th Precinct. W.’s mother, Frances Mendez, says that she was not allowed to see W. when she arrived at the station. When officers eventually allowed Mendez and her sister to see W., they claim that they found him in a panicked state with his left wrist handcuffed to a wall. W. allegedly spent six hours at the precinct. Mendez claims that officers “verbally, physically, and emotionally abused” W. during this time, and that they also “intimidated, humiliated, embarrassed and defamed” him.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>W. was charged with robbery, but prosecutors dropped the charges on December 26. The NYPD denied any mistreatment of W., and claimed that they treated him as they do any other juvenile suspect. An NYPD source said that W. arrived at the precinct at about 3:00 p.m. and left with his mother and aunt around 7:45 p.m. That would still constitute a total time period of almost ten hours, but the police deny any improper treatment of the child.</p>

<p>Mendez filed a claim against the city and the NYPD in late January 2013. Although several news sources describe it as a “lawsuit,” it is probably a <a href="http://www.comptroller.nyc.gov/bureaus/bla/filing_claims.shtm" title="Instructions for Filing Tort Claims" target="_blank">Notice of Claim</a>, a prerequisite to any lawsuit claiming damages against the city, including injuries and civil rights violations. The doctrine of sovereign immunity prohibits lawsuits against the state unless expressly authorized by law or contract. Most jurisdictions have an agency or office tasked with receiving and evaluating claims for damages. The amount of damages that Mendez is claiming, $250 million, may prove to be higher than she could obtain at trial, but this phase is primarily intended to present a claim to the government in an effort to settle before suit.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064340.html" title="Injuries to Minors & Children">personal injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people in Maryland who have been injured due to the illegal or negligent acts of others, including police brutality or abuse of power. Contact us today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/08/federal_lawsuit_alleges_police_1.html" title="Federal Lawsuit Alleges Police Brutality; Local DA Declines to Prosecute Officers">Federal Lawsuit Alleges Police Brutality; Local DA Declines to Prosecute Officers</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, August 13, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/08/lawsuit_alleges_prison_nurse_d_1.html" title="Lawsuit Alleges Prison Nurse Denied Emergency Medical Care to Inmate.">Lawsuit Alleges Prison Nurse Denied Emergency Medical Care to Inmate</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, August 7, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/01/legislator_awarded_50000_in_su_1.html" title="Legislator Awarded $50,000 in Suit for Damages Caused by Tight Handcuffs">Legislator Awarded $50,000 in Suit for Damages Caused by Tight Handcuffs</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, January 2, 2012</p>

<p>Photo credit: <a href="http://www.morguefile.com/creative/drowninsanity" target="_blank">drowninsanity</a> from <a href="http://www.morguefile.com/" target="_blank">morguefile.com</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Maryland Drinking Water Found to Contain Pollutants</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/02/maryland_drinking_water_found.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2328" title="Maryland Drinking Water Found to Contain Pollutants" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2328</id>
    
    <published>2013-02-04T16:58:39Z</published>
    <updated>2013-02-05T01:28:04Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The discovery of contaminated drinking water in Salisbury, Maryland last year reportedly led to a quick response by both the state and federal governments. Households in the area have received bottled water and filters, in the hopes of making the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Premises Liability" />
            <category term="Products Liability" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="Lislegroundwatersitemap.jpg" title="By Environmental Protection Agency [Public domain or Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/Lislegroundwatersitemap.jpg" align="right" width="193" height="300" />The <a href="http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20130120/NEWS/130120009/Md-family-s-plight-after-water-found-poisoned?nclick_check=1" title="Md. family's plight after water found poisoned" target="_blank">discovery of contaminated drinking water</a> in Salisbury, Maryland last year reportedly led to a quick response by both the state and federal governments. Households in the area have received bottled water and filters, in the hopes of making the water safer for consumption. Investigators are still trying to determine the source of the contamination. The pollutant, an industrial solvent known as <a href="http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/trichloroethylene.cfm" title="Basic Information about Trichloroethylene in Drinking Water" target="_blank">trichloroethylene (TCE)</a>, has unfortunately been a rather common contaminant in drinking water supplies around the country, and not every affected population has received as thorough a response as this Maryland town. Lawsuits against businesses and government entities, including a multi-district litigation (MDL) case against the federal government in Georgia, have asserted claims for negligence related to TCE contamination.</p>

<p>TCE is a volatile organic compound (VOC) used primarily in degreasing fabricated metal parts and other industrial processes. It does not occur in nature, but can end up in groundwater due to industrial use and disposal. It is usually colorless, nonflammable, and has an odor similar to chloroform. In large concentrations, it can have serious health effects. Contact with the skin can cause rashes, and consumption can cause liver problems and a heightened risk of cancer. The EPA, under the Safe Drinking Water Act, must establish a level for chemicals at which adverse health effects should not occur. For TCE, the level set by the EPA is zero.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.delmarvanow.com/article/20130120/WIC/301200007/Is-your-water-safe-" title="Is your water safe?" target="_blank">TCE contamination</a> in groundwater just south of Salisbury was first discovered in the fall of 2012. At least eighty-two homes have been affected by the pollutant. In tests of 227 private wells conducted by the Maryland Department of Environment (MDE), ninety-three tested positive for varying levels of TCE. The safety limit set by the state for TCE is 2.18 parts-per-billion (ppb). Some of the wells in Salisbury had TCE levels as high as fifty-six ppb. The source, or sources, of the contamination remains unknown. Investigators are reportedly puzzled by test results, some of which show one well with excessively high TCE levels and another well less than one thousand feet away showing almost no contamination.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The MDE reportedly provided bottled water and active-charcoal filters to affected households. The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reportedly providing “whole-house systems,” valued at $1,000 to $2,000 each, to homes that tested higher than thirty ppb, as well as homes with children under the age of six and pregnant women. The MDE will cover the annual maintenance cost, around $1,000, for these systems.</p>

<p>The most well-known recent litigation involving TCE is probably the series of cases involving <a href="http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/sites/lejeune/background.html" title="Camp Lejeune, North Carolina" target="_blank">pollution at Camp Lejeune</a>, which was consolidated into an MDL case, <a href="http://dockets.justia.com/docket/georgia/gandce/1:2011md02218/173431/" title="In Re Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Water Contamination Litigation" target="_blank"><em>In re Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Water Contamination Litigation</em>, No. 1:11-md-02218, MDL No. 2218 (N.D. Ga., Feb. 4, 2011)</a>. The case initially involved four claims against the U.S. government brought by people who lived at Camp Lejeune, a Marines Corps base in North Carolina, during the period between 1957 and 1987. Contamination by various VOCs, including TCE, allegedly caused the plaintiffs to develop a range of health problems. The court dismissed much of the Camp Lejeune case in mid-2012 on statute of limitations grounds, but the case remains under appeal. According to the <a href="http://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/pending-mdls-0" title="Pending MDLs" target="_blank">Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation</a>, as of January 2013 the case involves eleven individual claims.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064348.html" title="Products Liability">personal injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people in Maryland who have been injured due to the negligent or illegal acts of others. Contact us today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/03/fourth_circuit_apportions_dama_1.html" title="Fourth Circuit Apportions Damages Pro Rata in Maryland Lead Poisoning Case">Fourth Circuit Apportions Damages Pro Rata in Maryland Lead Poisoning Case</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, March 14, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2009/03/baltimore_county_jury_awards_o.html" title="Baltimore County Jury Awards Over $150 Million to Victims of Jacksonville Exxon Gas Spill">Baltimore County Jury Awards Over $150 Million to Victims of Jacksonville Exxon Gas Spill</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, March 13, 2009</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2007/12/maryland_family_files_class_ac.html" title="Maryland Family Files Class Action Injury Lawsuit Against Constellation Energy After Husband Dies From Drinking Contaminated Water">Maryland Family Files Class Action Injury Lawsuit Against Constellation Energy After Husband Dies From Drinking Contaminated Water</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, December 3, 2007</p>

<p>Photo credit: By Environmental Protection Agency [Public domain or Public domain], <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ALislegroundwatersitemap.jpg" target="_blank">via Wikimedia Commons</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Cruise Industry Adopts New Safety Standards After 2012 Cruise Ship Crash</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2013/01/cruise_industry_adopts_new_saf.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2323" title="Cruise Industry Adopts New Safety Standards After 2012 Cruise Ship Crash" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2013://1.2323</id>
    
    <published>2013-01-29T04:45:29Z</published>
    <updated>2013-01-30T01:15:45Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA), a global trade organization representing cruise lines, has put ten new safety policies into place over the past year in response to the Contra Concordia crash off the coast of Italy last January. The...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Boating Accidents" />
            <category term="Wrongful Death" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="Collision_of_Costa_Concordia_12.jpg" title="By Rvongher (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/Collision_of_Costa_Concordia_12.jpg" align="right" width="300" height="200" />The Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA), a global trade organization representing cruise lines, has put <a href="http://intransit.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/23/before-setting-off-a-drill/" title="Before Setting Off, a Drill" target="_blank">ten new safety policies</a> into place over the past year in response to the Contra Concordia crash off the coast of Italy last January. The United Nations’ maritime safety agency gave its approval to the new policies near the end of 2012, effectively giving them the force of international law. They include mandatory lifeboat training for crew members, restrictions on bridge access, and minimum requirements for life jackets. One of the new safety policies will directly affect cruise passengers, as it requires emergency drills for all passengers, known as “musters,” prior to the ship’s departure from port.</p>

<p>The Costa Concordia struck a boulder as it cruised near the shore of the island of Giglio, located off the coast of Tuscany in northern Italy, on January 13, 2012. The captain was allegedly trying to execute a display maneuver called a “salute” when the ship ran into a rock, causing it to founder and capsize. Thirty-two of the more than 4,200 people on board, <a href="http://www.webcitation.org/66zrEpvri" title="2 American, 2 German victims of the Costa Concordia cruise ship disaster are identified" target="_blank">including two Americans</a>, died as a result. It took divers days to locate most of the bodies, and it took authorities weeks to complete positive identifications. Italian prosecutors charged the ship’s captain with <a href="http://www.webcitation.org/65mQ7BysG" title="Prosecutors target cruise ship captain, Costa executives" target="_blank">multiple counts of manslaughter and other offenses</a>, alleging that he caused the crash by taking the enormous ship dangerously close to the island. The first officer and several officials of Costa Cruises were also under investigation. Numerous civil lawsuits, including wrongful death claims by families of the victims and claims for injuries by both passengers and crew members, followed the criminal investigation.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>CLIA undertook a <a href="http://www.cruising.org/regulatory/news/press_releases/2012/12/international-maritime-organization-imo-incorporate-recommendation-globa" title="International Maritime Organization (IMO) to Incorporate Recommendation from Global Cruise Industry Operational Safety Review in Key Maritime Safety Treaty" target="_blank">comprehensive review of safety procedures</a>, which it called the <a href="http://www.cruising.org/regulatory/cruise-industry-policies/cruise-industry-operational-safety-review" title="Cruise Industry Operational Safety Review" target="_blank">Cruise Industry Operational Safety Review</a>, beginning in early 2012. The International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency, <a href="http://www.imo.org/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/55-MSC-91-ends.aspx" title="Maritime Safety Committee agrees new measures for passenger ship safety and protection of personnel from noise on-board ships" target="_blank">approved the new policies</a> in December 2012. New policies include:<br />
- The “Bridge Access Policy,” which limits access to the bridge to necessary personnel;<br />
- The “Excess Lifejackets Policy,” which requires that cruise ships carry a number of life jackets equal to the total number of people on the ship plus the total number of people berthed in the most crowded vertical fire zone; and<br />
- The “Common Elements of Musters and Emergency Instructions Policy,” which establishes elements that must be included in all emergency instructions, such as lifejacket instructions and locations, emergency signals, and evacuation procedures.</p>

<p>The new policy that is most relevant to passengers is the “Passenger Muster Policy.” Passengers must participate in a muster before the ship leaves port, and passengers who arrive late must receive prompt safety briefings. This replaces an earlier policy requiring musters within twenty-four hours of a ship’s departure. The IMO, in addition to approving the ten new policies, also incorporated the passenger muster policy into the <a href="http://www.imo.org/about/conventions/listofconventions/pages/international-convention-for-the-safety-of-life-at-sea-(solas),-1974.aspx" title="International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974" target="_blank">International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS)</a>, essentially making it a global mandate for cruise ships.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064350.html" title="Boating Accidents">personal injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people in Maryland who have been injured due to the illegal or negligent acts of others. Contact us today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>Web Resources:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.cruising.org/sites/default/files/osr_executive_summary_12-18-2012.pdf" target="_blank">Operational Safety Review Executive Summary (PDF file)</a>, Cruise Lines International Association, December 2012</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/03/after_accidents_auto_safety_ad_1.html" title="After Accidents, Auto Safety Advocates Push for Federal Regulation of Car Rental Industry">After Accidents, Auto Safety Advocates Push for Federal Regulation of Car Rental Industry</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, March 28, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2009/05/maryland_car_accident_lawyers_1.html" title="Maryland Car Accident Lawyers: 508,000 Marylanders Will Drive 50 Miles or More This Memorial Day Weekend, Says AAA">Maryland Car Accident Lawyers: 508,000 Marylanders Will Drive 50 Miles or More This Memorial Day Weekend, Says AAA</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, May 21, 2009</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2008/06/carney_man_pleads_guilty_to_ne.html" title="Carney Man Pleads Guilty To Negligent Manslaughter in 2007 Maryland Boating Accident that Killed an Ellicott Man">Carney Man Pleads Guilty To Negligent Manslaughter in 2007 Maryland Boating Accident that Killed an Ellicott Man</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, June 12, 2008</p>

<p>Photo credit: By Rvongher (Own work) [<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0" target="_blank">CC-BY-SA-3.0</a>], <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ACollision_of_Costa_Concordia_12.jpg" target="_blank">via Wikimedia Commons</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

