<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Maryland Accident Law Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="Maryland Accident Law Blog" />
    <updated>2012-05-17T18:39:25Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Published By Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Parents of Students Killed in 2010 Boat Accident Settle Federal Lawsuit</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/05/parents_of_students_killed_in_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2009" title="Parents of Students Killed in 2010 Boat Accident Settle Federal Lawsuit" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.2009</id>
    
    <published>2012-05-16T04:23:10Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-17T18:39:25Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The parents of two students who died in a July 2010 boat accident settled their wrongful death lawsuit a few days into its trial in a Philadelphia federal court. The lawsuit included eighteen survivors from the accident, which occurred on...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Boating Accidents" />
            <category term="Wrongful Death" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Duck_Tour_boat_beaching.JPG" alt="'Duck Tour boat beaching' by Iridescent (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html), CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) or CC-BY-SA-2.5-2.0-1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5-2.0-1.0)], via Wikimedia Commons" target="_blank"><img alt="'Duck Tour boat beaching' by Iridescent (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html), CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) or CC-BY-SA-2.5-2.0-1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5-2.0-1.0)], via Wikimedia Commons" title="'Duck Tour boat beaching' by Iridescent (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html), CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) or CC-BY-SA-2.5-2.0-1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5-2.0-1.0)], via Wikimedia Commons" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/Duck_Tour_boat_beaching_05152012-thumb.JPG" align="right" width="300" height="195" /></a>The parents of two students who died in a July 2010 <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064350.html" title="Boating Accidents">boat accident</a> settled their <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/02/philadelphia-duck-boat-cash_n_1470455.html?ref=crime" title="2010 Philadelphia Duck Boat Crash Video Released Before Trial">wrongful death lawsuit</a> a few days into its trial in a Philadelphia federal court. The lawsuit included eighteen survivors from the accident, which occurred on the Delaware River when a city-owned barge collided with a tour boat. The plaintiffs had faced a possible <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/parents-two-drowned-duck-boat-riders-fight-liability-230142974.html" title="Parents of two drowned Duck Boat riders fight liability cap">cap on damages</a> for their claims in the lawsuit based on federal maritime law. The parties <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/05/duck-boat-victims-settle-suit-for-17m/1?csp=34news#.T7MG8VJDS6s" title="Victims of Philly duck boat crash settle suit for $17M">reached a settlement</a> at the urging of the judge.</p>

<p>The accident occurred in July 2010 on a stretch of the Delaware River in view of downtown Philadelphia. Thirty-seven passengers and crew were on board an amphibious duck boat, a vehicle that can drive on land and in water, commonly used for sightseeing tours. The duck boat had overheated due to a misplaced radiator cap. In the 103-degree heat, the duck boat’s captain reportedly thought the steam off the engine was fire. The captain dropped anchor immediately, leaving the boat stranded in a busy channel.</p>

<p>At the same time, an eighty-yard barge pushed by a tug was coming through the channel.The tugboat captain reportedly had a family emergency and was busy on his cellphone. He moved to a part of the tugboat where he could not see the river. He therefore failed to see the barge bearing down on the duck boat. The barge collided with the duck boat, causing it to capsize. Two passengers, 16 year-old Dora Schwendtner and 20 year-old Szabolcs Prem, both students from Hungary, died in the collision. Twenty-six passengers were injured. The tugboat captain is now serving a one-year prison sentence for involuntary manslaughter. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The parents of Schwendtner and Prem, along with eighteen survivors, sued K-Sea Transportation, which operated the tugboat; Ride the Ducks, which ran the tour boat; and the city of Philadelphia, which owned the barge. The lawsuit claimed that K-Sea’s employees were negligent in failing to prevent or avoid the collision. It claimed that Ride the Ducks was negligent for failing to advise passengers to put on life preservers until just before the collision, for failing to equip the boat with an emergency air horn or radio, and for a poor boat design that allegedly trapped both victims underwater.</p>

<p>The plaintiffs originally filed their lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court, but the defendants removed it to <a href="http://dockets.justia.com/docket/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2010cv05007/386869/">federal court.</a> The defendants claimed that federal maritime law imposed strict limits on their liability, based solely on the value of their vessels. Ride the Ducks claimed that their liability could not exceed $150,000, and K-Sea claimed their maximum liability was $1.5 million.</p>

<p>The trial began on Monday, May 7, 2012. Schwendtner and Prem’s parents came from Hungary to attend the trial. Plaintiffs’ attorneys showed a video of the collision, in which the barge ran over the duck boat. Schwendter appears in the video, tossing a life jacket to someone who had jumped from the boat, just before the two vessels collided. By Tuesday, the judge asked attorneys to attempt a settlement. On Wednesday, they announced a $17 million settlement. Schwendtner and Prem’s families will receive $15 million, and the eighteen survivors in the suit will split $2 million.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063430.html" title="Wrongful Death">Maryland accident injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people injured in boating accidents in Maryland waters. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html" title="Contact Us">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/09/maryland_lawsuit_seeks_to_hold_1.html" title="Maryland Lawsuit Seeks to Hold Bar Liable for Intoxicated Boating Accident">Maryland Lawsuit Seeks to Hold Bar Liable for Intoxicated Boating Accident</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, September 8, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/06/11_maryland_boating_accident_d.html" title="11 Maryland Boating Accident Deaths Reported to Date for 2011">11 Maryland Boating Accident Deaths Reported to Date for 2011</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, June 15, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2009/06/maryland_boating_accident_teen.html" title="Maryland Boating Accident: Teenager Seriously Hurt While Trying to Dock a Personal Watercraft">Maryland Boating Accident: Teenager Seriously Hurt While Trying to Dock a Personal Watercraft</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, June 7, 2009</p>

<p>Photo credit: 'Duck Tour boat beaching' by Iridescent (Own work) [<a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html" target="_blank">GFDL</a>, <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/" target="_blank">CC-BY-SA-3.0</a> or <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5-2.0-1.0" target="_blank">CC-BY-SA-2.5-2.0-1.0</a>], <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ADuck_Tour_boat_beaching.JPG" target="_blank">via Wikimedia Commons</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Mother of Murdered UVA Lacrosse Player Files Wrongful Death Lawsuits</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/05/mother_of_murdered_uva_lacross_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1998" title="Mother of Murdered UVA Lacrosse Player Files Wrongful Death Lawsuits" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1998</id>
    
    <published>2012-05-04T19:01:43Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-04T19:24:07Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Sharon Love, the mother of Yeardley Love, has filed two lawsuits related to her daughter’s 2010 murder. Yeardley Love was a lacrosse player at the University of Virginia when her ex-boyfriend, George Huguely, killed her in May 2010. Huguely was...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Wrongful Death" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sharon Love, the mother of Yeardley Love, has filed two <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/yeardley-loves-mother-sues-convicted-uva-killer-george/story?id=16227560#.T6QXsVJDS6t" title="Yeardley Love's Mom Sues Killer George Huguely for $30M" target="_blank">lawsuits related to her daughter’s 2010 murder</a>. Yeardley Love was a lacrosse player at the University of Virginia when her ex-boyfriend, George Huguely, killed her in May 2010. Huguely was convicted of second-degree murder in February 2012 and awaits sentencing. Sharon Love <a href="http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2012/04/27/yeardley-loves-mother-seeks-millions-in-lawsuit-against-george-huguely/" title="Yeardley Love’s Mother Seeks Millions In Lawsuit Against George Huguely" target="_blank">sued Huguely for wrongful death</a>, and has now filed a separate lawsuit against the Commonwealth of Virginia, the university, and several athletic officials in connection with Yeardley Love’s death.</p>

<p><img style="visibility:hidden;width:0px;height:0px;" border=0 width=0 height=0 src="http://c.gigcount.com/wildfire/IMP/CXNID=2000002.11NXC/bT*xJmx*PTEzMzYxNTQ5MTIzNzUmcHQ9MTMzNjE1NDkxNTQyMSZwPSZkPSZnPTImbz1mMDlhY2FiZTRkNDY*ZjRhYmEyOTRiZjU3/YmVmOGJmZSZvZj*w.gif" /><object name="kaltura_player_1336154910" id="kaltura_player_1336154910" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" allowNetworking="all" allowFullScreen="true" height="221" width="392" data="http://cdnapi.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/wid/1_239097cy/uiconf_id/5590821"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="movie" value="http://cdnapi.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/wid/1_239097cy/uiconf_id/5590821"/><param name="flashVars" value="autoPlay=false&screensLayer.startScreenOverId=startScreen&screensLayer.startScreenId=startScreen"/><a href="http://corp.kaltura.com">video platform</a><a href="http://corp.kaltura.com/video_platform/video_management">video management</a><a href="http://corp.kaltura.com/solutions/video_solution">video solutions</a><a href="http://corp.kaltura.com/video_platform/video_publishing">video player</a></object></p>

<p><a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/magazine/05/11/virginia.lacrosse/index.html" title="Why did Yeardley Love have to die?" target="_blank">Yeardley Love</a> was found unresponsive in her Charlottesville, Virginia apartment in the early morning of May 3, 2010. Emergency responders pronounced her dead at the scene and noted that she had signs of physical injury, particularly blunt-force head trauma. Police arrested Huguely, whom Love had briefly dated, the following day and charged him with murder. Huguely reportedly had a history of domestic violence complaints with Love. Huguely waived his Miranda rights and told police his account of what happened that night. He said that he entered her apartment and kicked her locked bedroom door open. He shook Love, causing her head to hit the wall repeatedly. He took her laptop when he left in order to dispose of it.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Prosecutors eventually added charges of felony murder, grand larceny, robbery, burglary, and other charges. A jury convicted Huguely of second-degree murder and grand larceny on February 22, 2012, recommending a total prison sentence of twenty-six years. The murder charge was reduced from first- to second-degree because of a lack of evidence of premeditation by Huguely. His sentencing is scheduled for August 30.</p>

<p>Love’s family, led by her mother Sharon Love, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/27/yeardley-love-civil-lawsuit-sharon-love_n_1458511.html" title="Sharon Love, Mother Of Yeardley Love, Files $30.5 Million Suit Against George Huguely" target="_blank">filed a lawsuit</a> in Charlottesville Circuit Court against Huguely for <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063430.html" title="Wrongful Death">wrongful death</a> in late April. The lawsuit alleges that Hugely “failed to use ordinary care,” causing an accident that resulted in Yeardley Love’s death. It further claims that Huguely knew, or should have known, that his assault left Love with potentially fatal injuries, and that he therefore should be held civilly liable for her death. The suit demands $29,450,000 in compensatory damages plus $1 million in punitive damages, reportedly <a href="http://www.newsplex.com/home/headlines/BREAKING_Mother_of_Yeardley_Love_Suing_George_Huguely_for_30M_149126355.html" title="The Value of a Life: How Did Love's Family Reach $30.45 Million?" target="_blank">based on statistics</a> suggesting Yeardley Love would have lived another fifty-nine years but for the assault that ended her life.</p>

<p>One week after filing suit against Huguely, Sharon Love <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/mother-of-slain-uva-student-files-lawsuit-against-state-mens-lacrosse-team-coaches/2012/05/03/gIQAfuBizT_story.html" title="Mother of slain Virginia lacrosse player sues state, lacrosse coaches, athletics director" target="_blank">sued the lacrosse team coaches</a>, the University of Virginia athletic director, the university itself, and the commonwealth of Virginia. This lawsuit alleges that the school officials “ignored [Huguely’s] erratic behavior,” which reportedly included intoxication, alcohol-related arrests, and incidents of violence against Love and another UVA female athlete. The coaches and players of both the men’s and women’s lacrosse teams, the suit claims, knew of Huguely’s “erratic, aggressive behavior,” but no one in a position of authority disciplined him or tried to get him help. This lawsuit also demands $29.45 million in compensatory damages.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064541.html" title="The Firm">Maryland personal injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people injured due to the negligence or illegal acts of others. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html" title="Contact Us">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/09/21_million_wrongful_death_suit_1.html" title="$21 Million Wrongful Death Suit for Murder of Inmate on Prison Bus Is Going to Trial">$21 Million Wrongful Death Suit for Murder of Inmate on Prison Bus Is Going to Trial</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, September 29, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/08/5m_baltimore_wrongful_death_la.html" title="$5M Baltimore Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Against Man Convicted of Involuntary Manslaughter in 2008 Inner Harbor Drowning">$5M Baltimore Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Against Man Convicted of Involuntary Manslaughter in 2008 Inner Harbor Drowning</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, August 30, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/05/anne_arundel_county_wrongful_d.html" title="Defendant's Shoes Included in Anne Arundel County Wrongful Death Settlement Over Deadly 2009 Beating of Crofton Teen">Defendant's Shoes Included in Anne Arundel County Wrongful Death Settlement Over Deadly 2009 Beating of Crofton Teen</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, May 9, 2011</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Federal Port Investigators Block Importation of Nearly 650,000 Allegedly Dangerous Products in Last Quarter of 2011</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/04/federal_port_investigators_blo_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1990" title="Federal Port Investigators Block Importation of Nearly 650,000 Allegedly Dangerous Products in Last Quarter of 2011" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1990</id>
    
    <published>2012-04-27T02:26:27Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-27T18:35:20Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the federal agency that monitors most consumer goods sold or imported in the U.S., recently reported on a collaboration with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents to monitor shipments of goods arriving at...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Products Liability" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aiga_customs.svg" target="_blank"><img align="right" alt="Aiga customs" width="300" height="259" title="'Aiga customs' by US Department of Transportation [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Aiga_customs.svg/450px-Aiga_customs.svg.png"></a>The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the federal agency that monitors most consumer goods sold or imported in the U.S., recently reported on a collaboration with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents to monitor shipments of goods arriving at international ports from abroad. The CPSC says that it either <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml12/12142.html" title="Port Surveillance News: CPSC Investigators Find, Stop Nearly 650,000 Unsafe Products at the Start of Fiscal Year 2012" target="_blank">seized or blocked over 647,000 units of goods deemed dangerous</a>, according to federal safety standards, in the last three months of 2011. The report offers interesting information on how the government assesses the safety of consumer products and monitors shipments from abroad.</p>

<p>The CPSC is an independent federal agency that regulates all consumer goods not specifically assigned to a different agency. For example, federal law gives authority over the safety of pharmaceutical products to the Food and Drug Administration. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms regulates guns, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration regulates the safety of automobiles. The CPSC has the authority to ban products it deems dangerous, keeping them out of the marketplace entirely. It can also issue recalls of products that have already reached consumers if it determines that the product poses a risk to the public.</p>

<p>The CPSC determines the safety of products by drawing on several sources. A national system that collects data from hospitals regarding injuries caused by consumer products allows the CPSC to estimate the probability of injuries from specific products. A consumer hotline and website, known as <a href="http://www.saferproducts.gov/About.aspx" title="About SaferProducts.gov" target="_blank">SaferProducts</a>, allows consumers to report injuries or concerns directly to the agency. The CPSC began operations in 1973 and commenced product screenings at U.S. ports that same year. It states that it “intensified its efforts” in 2008, when it launched its <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/importsafety.html" title="Import Safety" target="_blank">import surveillance division</a>.</p>

<p>During the fourth quarter of 2011, investigators with CPSC and CBP screened at least 2,900 shipments at U.S. ports of entry. CBP monitors ports of entry in all fifty states, D.C., and the major U.S. overseas possessions. It identifies <a href="http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/toolbox/contacts/ports/md/1303.xml" title="Service Port-Baltimore" target="_blank">Baltimore</a> as the port of entry in Maryland. CPSC’s report does not indicate how many ports of entry were included in its screening.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The roughly 647,000 units stopped by the investigators reportedly represented 240 different products found to be in violation of various safety regulations. Many of the products were children’s toys with lead levels in excess of federal limits, children’s products with prohibited <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09121.html" title="CPSC Issues Guidance For Complying With Phthalates Requirements In New Child Safety Law" target="_blank">phthalate</a> components, and products that presented a danger of choking for small children. Other products included dangerous or defective appliances and other electric items. The CPSC report lists products that were blocked for violating a specific federal standard. The vast majority of these products came from China, with a significant number coming from Mexico. Two noncompliant products came from Japan.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064348.html" title="Products Liability">Products liability</a> law holds the manufacturer or supplier of an unreasonably dangerous product responsible for injuries sustained by consumers who use the product in its intended manner. The law frequently imposes a strict liability standard in cases of dangerous or defective products, meaning that a plaintiff does not have to prove negligence on the part of the manufacturer or supplier. The plaintiff must only prove that the product is unreasonably dangerous, and that the plaintiff did not use it negligently or improperly.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064541.html">Maryland personal injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people injured due to faulty or defective products. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/03/energy_drinks_allegedly_cause_1.html" title="Energy Drinks Allegedly Cause Maryland Teen's Death from Caffeine Toxicity">Energy Drinks Allegedly Cause Maryland Teen's Death from Caffeine Toxicity</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, March 21, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/03/maryland_teen_dies_after_falli.html" title="Maryland Teen Dies After Falling from Moving Vehicle, Mother Blames Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturer">Maryland Teen Dies After Falling from Moving Vehicle, Mother Blames Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturer</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, March 5, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/10/reliability_of_federal_product.html" title="Reliability of Federal Product Safety Database Questioned in Lawsuit">Reliability of Federal Product Safety Database Questioned in Lawsuit</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, October 27, 2011</p>

<p>Photo credit: 'Aiga customs' by US Department of Transportation [Public domain], <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aiga_customs.svg" target="_blank">via Wikimedia Commons</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Maryland&apos;s Graduated Driver&apos;s License Law Helps Prevent Teen Fatalities in Car Crashes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/04/marylands_graduated_drivers_li_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1984" title="Maryland's Graduated Driver's License Law Helps Prevent Teen Fatalities in Car Crashes" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1984</id>
    
    <published>2012-04-19T17:23:09Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-19T18:48:02Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Graduated driver licensing laws (GDL) in Maryland contribute to one of the lowest rates of automobile accident fatalities involving teen drivers, according to a recent study. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), working with State Farm Insurance, reviewed data on...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Car Accidents" />
            <category term="Injuries to Minors" />
            <category term="Traumatic Brain Injuries" />
            <category term="Wrongful Death" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a title="By Lake County Sheriffs Office (Teen Driver Challenge Facebook page)[see page for license], via Wikimedia Commons" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ATeenDriverChallenge.JPG" target="_blank"><img width="256" align="right" alt="TeenDriverChallenge" title="'TeenDriverChallenge' by Lake County Sheriffs Office (Teen Driver Challenge Facebook page)[see page for license], via Wikimedia Commons" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/TeenDriverChallenge.JPG"/></a>Graduated driver licensing laws (GDL) in Maryland contribute to one of the lowest rates of automobile accident fatalities involving teen drivers, according to a recent study. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), working with State Farm Insurance, reviewed data on <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/jimgorzelany/2012/04/02/forget-football-car-crashes-are-the-leading-cause-of-fatal-head-trauma-among-teens/" target="_blank">nationwide traffic accidents involving teenagers</a> between 2009 and 2010. The study defined “teens” as people ages 15 to 19. Maryland has one of the lowest rates of teen-driver-related fatalities in the nation, and the rate has substantially declined in the past five years. Robust GDL laws, in which teen drivers initially receive highly-restricted driver’s licenses and gradually earn additional privileges, show a strong correlation with low rates of fatal <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063420.html">automobile accidents</a> involving teen drivers.</p>

<p>CHOP’s report, entitled <a href="http://www.teendriversource.org/more_pages/page/miles_to_go/researcher" target="_blank">“Miles to Go,”</a> provides a “yearly snapshot of teen driver safety for the nation.” The study found over 55,000 serious injuries among teens due to car accidents in the period from 2009 to 2010. Thirty percent of those injuries involved head trauma, such as skull fractures or <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063432.html">traumatic brain injuries</a>. Head trauma is the leading cause of death for teens in traffic accidents.</p>

<p>A total of 3,413 car crash fatalities involving teen drivers occurred in 2010. Fatalities include teen drivers, passengers of teen drivers, people in other vehicles, and people not in a vehicle (e.g. pedestrians). The report notes that three out of ten teen fatalities in 2010 involved people outside the teen’s vehicle. The total number of fatalities involving teen drivers nationwide declined  by over thirty-five percent between 2005 and 2010.</p>

<p>Nationwide, the fatality rate for auto accidents involving teen drivers was 9.5 per 100,000 people. Maryland had the fifth-lowest rate in the country, with 5.8 per 100,000 people. This is a decline of more than forty-eight percent from 2005. The study’s authors credit strong GDL laws in the states with the lowest fatality rates.</p>

<p>Maryland’s GDL law, known as the <a href="http://www.mva.maryland.gov/Driver-Services/RookieDriver/bgeneral.htm" target="_blank">“Rookie Driver” program</a>, issues a driver’s license to teens in three stages: a learner’s permit, a provisional license, and a full driver’s license. A teen can apply for a learner’s permit at age 15 years and 9 months. A learner’s permit holder can only drive with a person age 21 or older, who has had a full license for at least three years (known as a “qualified supervising driver”), in the front passenger seat with them.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>After nine months and completion of a driver’s education course, a teen with a learner’s permit can apply for a provisional license. The teen must complete sixty hours of practice driving with a qualified supervising driver. Anyone under the age of 18 with a provisional license cannot drive between midnight and 5:00 a.m., unless they have an adult age 21 or older or an immediate family member with them.</p>

<p>Once a teen driver has had a provisional license for at least eighteen months, and turns 18 years old, the state will convert the provisional license to a full driver’s license. Violations of any of the GDL laws can result in license suspension or revocation, as well as further restrictions when the driver tries to upgrade the license.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064340.html">Maryland accident injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen pursue justice for people injured due to the negligence of others in automobile accidents. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/09/reduction_in_car_accident_fata_1.html">Reduction in Car Accident Fatalities Among 16 Year-Olds Matched by Rise Among 18 Year-Olds</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, September 16, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/07/harford_county_maryland_car_ac.html">Harford County, Maryland Car Accident Kills 14-Year-old Pylesville Pedestrian</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, July 31, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2010/08/family_members_on_bike_ride_in.html">Family Members on Bike Ride Injured in Anne Arundel County Car Crash Because Motorist Allegedly Lost Control of Vehicle</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, August 9, 2010</p>

<p>Photo credit: 'TeenDriverChallenge' by Lake County Sheriffs Office (Teen Driver Challenge Facebook page)[see page for license], <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ATeenDriverChallenge.JPG" target="_blank">via Wikimedia Commons</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>University of Maryland Study Shows Increased Risk of Pedestrian Injuries with Electronics Use</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/04/university_of_maryland_study_s_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1977" title="University of Maryland Study Shows Increased Risk of Pedestrian Injuries with Electronics Use" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1977</id>
    
    <published>2012-04-12T03:21:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-12T03:32:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A study conducted by researchers at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and the University of Maryland Medical Center has found that the number of pedestrians killed or injured in traffic accidents while wearing headphones tripled over a six-year...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Pedestrian Accident" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="800px-Headphones_Sony_super-light_04092012.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/800px-Headphones_Sony_super-light_04092012.jpg" title="'Headphones Sony super-light' by kazuh [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en)] via Wikimedia Commons" align="right" width="300" height="225" />A <a href="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/early/2012/01/03/injuryprev-2011-040161.abstract" target="_blank">study conducted by researchers at the University of Maryland School of Medicine</a> and the University of Maryland Medical Center has found that the number of pedestrians killed or injured in traffic accidents while wearing headphones <a href="http://www.mercyhealthsystem.org/body.cfm?id=446&action=detail&ref=42131" target="_blank">tripled over a six-year period</a> beginning in 2004. The researchers examined records of accident reports maintained by online news archives like Google and Westlaw, as well as data obtained from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). The study was published in the January 16, 2012 online edition of the medical journal <em>Injury Prevention</em>.</p>

<p>The study identified 116 reported injuries or fatalities of pedestrians wearing headphones. They found that sixty-eight percent of the victims were male. Sixty-seven percent were under thirty years old. Fifty-five percent of the vehicles involved were trains, while most of the rest were automobiles. Only seventy-four percent of the reports explicitly stated that the victim was wearing headphones at the time of the accident. The remainder of the reports noted that the vehicle honked or sounded some sort of warning before the accident, suggesting that the pedestrian could not hear the warning. Seventy percent of the <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064342.html">pedestrian accidents</a> reviewed by the researchers resulted in the pedestrian’s death.</p>

<p>The number of pedestrians injured or killed in traffic or train accidents while wearing headphones <a href="http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-01-16/news/bs-md-headphone-fatal-study-20120116_1_headphones-pedestrians-threefold-jump" target="_blank">tripled during the time period reviewed by the researchers</a>. They found that sixteen injuries or deaths occurred in 2004, the first year reviewed. The last year reviewed, covering the period from 2010 to 2011, had forty-seven such accidents.</p>

<p><a href="http://esciencenews.com/articles/2012/01/17/university.maryland.study.headphone.distracted.pedestrians.face.death.serious.injury" target="_blank">Two primary risks associated with headphone use</a> by pedestrians became clear from the statistics. First is the risk of distraction, causing a pedestrian not to notice an imminent threat like an approaching car or train. The other is what the authors called <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Headphones+Cause+Pedestrian+Injuries+to+Triple+Over+a+6Year+Period/article23810.htm" target="_blank">“sensory deprivation,”</a> or the inability of the pedestrian to hear an approaching vehicle or its warning sounds. The original inspiration for the study was reportedly the case of a Maryland teen who died after being struck by a train while crossing the tracks. Reports indicated the teen was wearing headphones and did not respond to warning sounds.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Drivers on Maryland roads have a duty of care to drive safely, obey traffic laws, and take reasonable measures to avoid accidents. This includes a duty to be mindful of pedestrians and give them the right-of-way under certain circumstances. Pedestrians also have a duty of care, though, to take reasonable measures to avoid accidents. This includes being mindful of traffic, staying out of the street except in designated crossing areas, and obeying traffic signals. This also includes staying off railroad tracks in almost all circumstances. In a claim for damages by a pedestrian injured by a car, train, or other vehicle, the court can consider whether negligence on the part of the pedestrian contributed to the accident. Even if a driver was negligent, a court could reduce a pedestrian’s damages in proportion to the pedestrian’s negligence.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063420.html">Maryland accident injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people injured in automobile accidents on Maryland roads. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/02/the_fight_against_distracted_d.html">The Fight Against Distracted Driving: Baltimore County Lawmaker Pushes for Tougher Cell Phone Driving Law</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, February 16, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2010/09/nhtsa_reports_547_maryland_tra.html">NHTSA Reports 547 Maryland Traffic Fatalities and 29 Washington DC Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths in 2009</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, September 15, 2010</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2010/07/toddler_and_teen_pedestrians_i_1.html">Toddler and Teen Pedestrians Injured During East Baltimore Car Accident</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, July 12, 2010</p>

<p>Photo credit: 'Headphones Sony super-light' by kazuh [<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en" target="_blank">CC BY 2.0</a>] <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Headphones_Sony_super-light.jpg" target="_blank">via Wikimedia Commons</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Sheriff&apos;s Deputy Not Liable in Maryland Stun Gun Death, Jury Says</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/04/sheriffs_deputy_not_liable_in_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1973" title="Sheriff's Deputy Not Liable in Maryland Stun Gun Death, Jury Says" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1973</id>
    
    <published>2012-04-05T01:29:05Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-06T18:47:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A federal jury in Baltimore returned a verdict in late January in favor of former Sheriff’s Deputy Rudy Torres, finding that he was not liable in the 2007 death of 20 year-old Jarrel Gray. While responding to a report of...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Police Brutality" />
            <category term="Wrongful Death" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a title="By jasonesbain (Taser) [CC-BY-2.0 (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ATaser-x26.jpg" target="_blank"><img width="256" align="right" alt="Taser-x26" title="'Taser-x26' by jasonesbain (Taser) [CC-BY-2.0 (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Taser-x26.jpg"/></a>A federal jury in Baltimore returned a verdict in late January in favor of former Sheriff’s Deputy Rudy Torres, finding that he was <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57366023/jury-finds-deputy-not-liable-in-md-stun-gun-death/" target="_blank">not liable in the 2007 death</a> of 20 year-old Jarrel Gray. While responding to a report of a fight, Torres used his electric stun gun on Gray twice. Gray died while waiting for an ambulance at the scene.</p>

<p>In the early morning of November 18, 2007, multiple people in a neighborhood just south of Frederick called police to report a fight. Torres responded to the call. One witness said he heard someone say “Get on the ground” and then heard a “pop noise” he recognized as a stun gun. Another witness at trial said that Gray was complying with Torres’ instructions when he used the stun gun the first time. A witness testified that he heard Gray say that his hands were on the ground.</p>

<p>After the first shock from the stun gun, Gray reportedly fell to the ground and did not move. He reportedly had his hands on the ground in front of him. Torres used the stun gun on Gray a second time, which Gray’s family’s attorney called “sadistic.” All parties agree that Gray was already dead by the time the ambulance arrived. The medical examiner reported that Gray died from “sudden death associated with restraint and alcohol intoxication.” According to Baltimore’s CBS affiliate WJZ, the medical examiner did not specifically identify the stun gun as the cause of death, but the stun gun was the only means of restraint included in the report.</p>

<p>Gray’s parents sued Torres, the Sheriff’s Department, and Frederick County for <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063430.html">wrongful death</a>. They alleged that Torres used <a href="http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2012/01/17/federal-trial-starts-in-md-stun-gun-death/" target="_blank">excessive and unnecessary force</a>. The suit demanded $145 million in damages.</p>

<p>A trial occurred in January that only addressed the Grays’ claims against Torres. Another trial against the sheriff’s office and the county may proceed at a later date. Torres argued that the <a href="http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2012/01/18/sheriff-defends-use-of-taser-in-wrongful-death-lawsuit/" target="_blank">use of force was reasonable</a> and necessary under the circumstances. He testified that Gray had his hands in his pants and was behaving erratically, although other witnesses reportedly contradicted that account. Torres said that the <a href="http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2012/01/23/defense-opening-case-in-stun-gun-death-trial/" target="_blank">second use of the stun gun was necessary</a> because Gray refused to show his hands.</p>

<p>A “law enforcement expert” retained by Torres’ defense team testified that Torres was reasonable in viewing Gray as a threat both times he used the stun gun. The expert reportedly told jurors that Gray’s lack of response after the first shock could have been an act.</p>

<p>The jury returned a verdict in favor of Torres on January 25, 2012. According to CBS News, the jury concluded that although Torres assaulted Gray, his use of the stun gun was a reasonable use of force to defend himself or others. Because they concluded that Torres used a reasonable amount of force, he was shielded from liability.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to WJZ, at least ten people have died from police use of stun guns in Maryland. The Maryland attorney general recommended stricter training on stun gun use in 2009, based in part on Gray’s death. Unreasonable and excessive use of force may expose police, both individually and at the department level, to liability for injuries that result.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063432.html">Maryland personal injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people injured due to the negligence or illegal acts of others. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/02/family_of_maryland_man_who_die.html">Family of Maryland Man Who Died in Police Custody Dismisses Suit Against Police, May Still Sue Hospital</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, February 27, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/01/legislator_awarded_50000_in_su_1.html">Legislator Awarded $50,000 in Suit for Damages Caused by Tight Handcuffs</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, January 2, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/08/federal_lawsuit_against_ice_ac.html">Federal Lawsuit Against ICE Accuses Anne Arundel County Police of Police Brutality During 2008 Immigration Raid in Maryland</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, August 11, 2011</p>

<p>Photo credit: 'Taser-x26' by jasonesbain (Taser) [<a href="www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0" target="_blank">CC-BY-2.0</a>], <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ATaser-x26.jpg" target="_blank">via Wikimedia Commons</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>After Accidents, Auto Safety Advocates Push for Federal Regulation of Car Rental Industry</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/03/after_accidents_auto_safety_ad_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1967" title="After Accidents, Auto Safety Advocates Push for Federal Regulation of Car Rental Industry" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1967</id>
    
    <published>2012-03-28T21:49:26Z</published>
    <updated>2012-03-28T22:01:07Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A tragic 2004 car crash has led to calls for federal legislation and regulation of the rental car industry. Two sisters, Raechel and Jacqueline Houck, 24 and 20 years of age respectively, rented a PT Cruiser from an Enterprise Rent-A-Car...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Car Accidents" />
            <category term="National Legislation" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="857409_d29620ea_03262012.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/857409_d29620ea_03262012.jpg" title="'Car rental car park, Stansted,' copyright Jonathan Billinger and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence" align="right" width="300" height="189" />A tragic 2004 car crash has led to <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/travel/story/2012-02-20/Safety-advocates-Rental-car-recalls-should-be-regulated/53180374/1" target="_blank">calls for federal legislation and regulation of the rental car industry</a>. Two sisters, Raechel and Jacqueline Houck, 24 and 20 years of age respectively, rented a PT Cruiser from an Enterprise Rent-A-Car in Capitola, California. The car was under recall at the time because of a problem with its power-steering, but the rental company had not performed any repairs. Since the issuance of the recall, it had reportedly rented the car to three other people before the Houcks. The power-steering fluid began to leak while they were driving, and it caught fire. This caused them to lose control of the car. Their car collided with a semi trailer, killing both of them. Enterprise admitted to liability, and a jury awarded $15 million in damages to the Houcks’ mother, Cally Houck, two years ago.</p>

<p>In an effort to prevent accidents like this one, which resulted from a failure to perform necessary repairs on a recalled vehicle, several United States senators introduced the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.1445.IS:" target="_blank">Raechel and Jacqueline Houck Safe Rental Car Act of 2011</a>. This law would have granted regulatory authority to two federal agencies to ensure that rental car companies performed repairs on any vehicles in their fleets under recall before renting them to consumers. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would be able to regulate the industry using existing deceptive trade practice laws, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) would be able to track and monitor safety features in vehicles rented to the public.</p>

<p>Under current law, the NHTSA can require auto manufacturers to repair vehicles under recall before distributing them to dealers. Dealers that sell new vehicles must also perform recall repairs before selling to consumers. None of these laws currently cover rental car companies, although they are reportedly the continent’s largest purchaser of new cars and supplier of used cars.</p>

<p>Out of the 1.6 million vehicles owned by American rental car companies, almost 184,000 were subject to a recall in 2011, according to USA TODAY. Toyota issued a recall in 2010 that affected around twenty-two percent of the total number of rental cars in the country. The main trade group representing rental companies told USA TODAY that the industry has a better track record for recall repairs than most vehicle owners. Still, the industry operates with almost no oversight, which concerns some safety advocates, and even some in the industry itself.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The second-largest auto rental company in the country, Hertz, recently reached an agreement with the NHTSA to <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/travel/story/2012-02-20/Hertz-agrees-to-government-oversight-of-recalled-cars/53180734/1" target="_blank">provide the agency with oversight over recalled cars in its fleet</a>. The company will join with safety advocates to ask Congress to pass a law providing for oversight. Several senators who sponsored the bill named for the Houcks have said they will introduce legislation again soon. Other rental car companies disagree with Hertz’s view, stating that the industry can regulate itself and that the proposed new laws leave other industries untouched, including taxis and limousines.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063420.html">Maryland accident injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people injured in automobile accidents on Maryland roads. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/02/four_die_in_car_crash_in_anne.html">Four Die in Car Crash in Anne Arundel County, Maryland</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, February 20, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/01/maryland_traffic_cameras_seek_1.html">Maryland Traffic Cameras Seek to Deter Speeding, Promote Safe Driving</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, January 23, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/09/two_senior_citizens_killed_in_1.html">Two Senior Citizens Killed in Benedict, Maryland, Car Accident</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, September 20, 2011</p>

<p>Photo credit: <a href="http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/857409" target="_blank">'Car rental car park, Stansted,'</a> copyright <a href="http://www.geograph.org.uk/profile/8569" target="_blank">Jonathan Billinger</a> and licensed for <a href="http://www.geograph.org.uk/reuse.php?id=857409" target="_blank">reuse</a> under this <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/" target="_blank">Creative Commons Licence</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Energy Drinks Allegedly Cause Maryland Teen&apos;s Death from Caffeine Toxicity</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/03/energy_drinks_allegedly_cause_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1957" title="Energy Drinks Allegedly Cause Maryland Teen's Death from Caffeine Toxicity" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1957</id>
    
    <published>2012-03-21T23:12:30Z</published>
    <updated>2012-03-22T23:48:36Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Did energy drinks cause the death of a Maryland teenager? Fourteen year-old Anais Fournier, of Hagerstown, was at the mall with friends on December 16, 2011. Her friends told the Record Herald that Fournier drank one 24-ounce energy drink that...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Injuries to Minors" />
            <category term="Products Liability" />
            <category term="Wrongful Death" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a title="By Grendelkhan at en.Wikipedia [GFDL (www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AEnergy_drinks.jpg" target="_blank"><img width="256" align="right" title="'Energy drinks' by Grendelkhan at en.Wikipedia [GFDL (www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons" alt="Energy drinks" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/Energy_drinks.jpg/256px-Energy_drinks.jpg"/></a>Did energy drinks cause the <a href="http://todayhealth.today.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/21/10780958-teen-girl-dies-of-caffeine-toxicity-after-downing-2-energy-drinks#.T2oTX6YtTmI.email" target="_blank">death of a Maryland teenager?</a> Fourteen year-old Anais Fournier, of Hagerstown, was at the mall with friends on December 16, 2011. Her friends told the <em>Record Herald</em> that Fournier drank one 24-ounce energy drink that day, and that she drank another one less than twenty-four hours later. On December 17, she went into cardiac arrest. Doctors at a Baltimore hospital induced a coma to prevent her brain from swelling, but six days later, she died, having never regained consciousness.</p>

<p>Fournier’s death certificate lists “cardiac arrhythmia due to caffeine toxicity” as her official cause of death. She reportedly suffered a <a href="http://www.therecordherald.com/news/x364060147/Caffeine-toxicity-from-energy-drinks-cited-in-Anais-Fourniers-death" target="_blank">complete lack of oxygen to her brain</a> when she lost consciousness. Fournier had a heart condition that can cause heart valve malfunctions. Doctors did not directly connect her heart condition to the arrhythmia that caused her death, but heart conditions are among the risk factors in <a href="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/127/3/511.long" target="_blank">scientific studies of energy drinks</a>.</p>

<p>The forty-eight ounces consumed by Fournier reportedly contained 480 milligrams of caffeine, which according to TODAY Health is almost five times the limit that the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends, and roughly equal to the amount of fourteen 12-ounce cans of Coca-Cola. Many beverages marketed as “energy drinks” contain ingredients like guarana and taurine that themselves contain caffeine, as well as high levels of sodium and sugar. The <em>Record Herald</em> reports that doctors advise parents to keep such energy drinks away from children, citing potential side effects like high blood pressure, seizures, and even death. Energy drinks can be especially dangerous for people with diabetes, high or low blood sugar, or heart conditions.</p>

<p>Fournier’s death has led her family, friends, and others to call for regulation of energy drinks by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Energy drinks are reportedly categorized as “nutritional supplements,” and so are not subject to the FDA’s limit of 71 milligrams of caffeine per 12 ounces in soda. They are also not subject to the FDA’s safety testing and labeling requirements. A press release from the American Beverage Association, issued about a month before Fournier’s death and  quoted by the <em>Record Herald</em>, alleged that energy drinks have FDA approval, and that they contain less caffeine than a typical cup of coffee. While an 8-ounce energy drink contains between 60 and 100 milligrams of caffeine, according to the press release, a similar amount of coffee contains between 104 and 192 milligrams.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Energy drinks are subject to more and more scrutiny as people suffer injuries and even death after consuming moderate to large quantities. Scientific literature has shown that energy drinks might potentially pose health risks to children and teenagers. Fournier’s case is one of many recent tragedies seemingly related to energy drinks. Under a products liability or negligence theory, a manufacturer could be liable for injuries or deaths linked to energy drinks.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064348.html">Maryland personal injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people injured due to faulty or defective products. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/03/maryland_teen_dies_after_falli.html">Maryland Teen Dies After Falling from Moving Vehicle, Mother Blames Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturer</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, March 5, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/10/reliability_of_federal_product.html">Reliability of Federal Product Safety Database Questioned in Lawsuit</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, October 27, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.washingtondcinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/dc_area_teens_family_files_wro.html">DC Area Teen’s Family Files Wrongful Death Lawsuit Against Four Loko Manufacturer</a>, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, May 30, 2011</p>

<p>Photo credit: 'Energy drinks' by Grendelkhan at en.Wikipedia [<a href="www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html" target="_blank">GFDL</a>], <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AEnergy_drinks.jpg" target="_blank">via Wikimedia Commons</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Fourth Circuit Apportions Damages Pro Rata in Maryland Lead Poisoning Case</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/03/fourth_circuit_apportions_dama_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1945" title="Fourth Circuit Apportions Damages Pro Rata in Maryland Lead Poisoning Case" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1945</id>
    
    <published>2012-03-14T17:34:53Z</published>
    <updated>2012-03-16T18:30:38Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A Baltimore girl’s $2 million jury verdict for toxic exposure to lead paint suffered a setback last month, when the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the insurance company for the realty company that owned the house where she...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Injuries to Minors" />
            <category term="Insurance Disagreement" />
            <category term="Premises Liability" />
            <category term="Unsafe Premises" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="1380014_91643084_03162012.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/1380014_91643084_03162012.jpg" align="right" title="'generic color swatches f' by deafstar on stock.xchng" width="300" height="251" />A Baltimore girl’s $2 million jury verdict for toxic exposure to lead paint <a href="http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20120207/NEWS06/120209910" target="_blank">suffered a setback</a> last month, when the <a href="http://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca4/10-1988/" target="_blank">Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals</a> ruled that the insurance company for the realty company that owned the house where she lived would only be obligated to pay forty percent of the total judgment. She still stands to receive a substantial sum of money, but the court’s ruling cuts the amount she may realistically expect to collect.</p>

<p>Lakia Roberts lived at a house in Baltimore from 1991 to 1998. When she was only twenty months old in 1992, doctors diagnosed her with lead poisoning. She continued to exhibit elevated levels of lead in her blood until 1995. <a href="http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002473.htm" target="_blank">Lead poisoning</a> can have serious health effects on children, including learning disabilities and kidney damage, according to the National Institutes of Health. Roberts and her mother filed a state lawsuit against Attsgood Realty Company in 2005, claiming that the company’s negligent management of the property where they lived caused her lead poisoning.</p>

<p>As we previously reported in this <a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2009/05/18yearold_gets_2_million_maryl.html" target="_blank">Maryland Accident Law Blog</a>, a jury awarded Robert $2 million in 2009, consisting of $500,000 in actual damages and $1.5 million in non-economic damages. Due to a Maryland law that caps non-economic damages at $350,000, her total judgment was reduced to $850,000.</p>

<p>Attsgood had sought defense and indemnification from its liability insurer, Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, commonly known as Penn National. The company had issued an insurance policy to Attsgood with one year of coverage beginning on January 13, 1992, later extended by another year. Attsgood did not have liability coverage on the property before this date. Attsgood sold the property on November 1, 1993. The policy with Penn National stated that it would pay damages for bodily injury and property damage occurring during the term of the policy.</p>

<p>After the jury verdict in 2009, Penn National sought a declaratory judgment in federal court holding that it was only obligated to pay at most $340,000, that being forty percent of the judgment against Attsgood. It argued that, since Roberts’ claim was for ongoing damages occurring from her birth on January 17, 1991 until August 1995, when the lead in her blood reached normal levels, it should only be obligated pay pay for the damages that occurred after its coverage began on January 13, 1992 and before Attsgood sold the property in November 1993. Roberts argued that Penn National should be obligated to pay the full amount of the judgment.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The U.S. District Court in Baltimore found that the total amount of time Roberts was exposed to the lead paint was fifty-five months, from January 1992 to August 1995. It held that Penn National was obligated to pay for damages during its two years of liability coverage, or 24/55 of the total judgment. Both parties appealed, and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Penn National’s favor. Penn National had argued that, because Attsgood had sold the property in November 1993, it should not be obligated to pay for the last two months of coverage. The appeals court reduced the total amount owed by Penn National to 22/55 of the total, or $340,000.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064340.html">Maryland injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen represent people who have been injured by exposure to toxic substances like lead paint in homes. For a free and confidential consultation, <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949.</p>

<p><strong>Web Resources:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/101987.P%20%28MD%20accident%29.pdf" target="_blank">Opinion (PDF)</a>, <em>Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. vs. Lakia C. Roberts and Attsgood Realty Co., et al.</em>, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, February 3, 2012</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/12/maryland_court_strikes_down_st_1.html">Maryland Court Strikes Down State Lead Paint Law</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, December 12, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/10/lawsuit_alleges_deliberate_exp.html">Lawsuit Alleges Deliberate Exposure of Baltimore Children to Lead Poisoning</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, October 6, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/04/baltimores_public_housing_auth.html">Baltimore's Public Housing Authority Says It is “Not Possible” To Pay Judgments in Maryland Lead Poisoning Cases</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, April 11, 2011</p>

<p>Photo credit: <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1380014" target="_blank">'generic color swatches f'</a> by <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/profile/deafstar" target="_blank">deafstar</a> on <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/" target="_blank">stock.xchng</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Maryland Teen Dies After Falling from Moving Vehicle, Mother Blames Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/03/maryland_teen_dies_after_falli.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1934" title="Maryland Teen Dies After Falling from Moving Vehicle, Mother Blames Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturer" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1934</id>
    
    <published>2012-03-05T20:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-03-05T20:01:08Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A Maryland teenager died the evening of Saturday, February 18, 2012, when he fell from a moving car and was struck by another vehicle. Michael Truluck, age 13, had allegedly consumed an energy drink containing alcohol earlier in the evening...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Injuries to Minors" />
            <category term="Products Liability" />
            <category term="Wrongful Death" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="1144226_36176495_03052012.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/1144226_36176495_03052012.jpg" align="right" title="'mean bean' by KD Kelly on stock.xchng" width="300" height="225" />A Maryland teenager died the evening of Saturday, February 18, 2012, when he <a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/baltimore-county/bs-md-co-teen-death-20120221,0,2002827.story" target="_blank">fell from a moving car</a> and was struck by another vehicle. Michael Truluck, age 13, had allegedly consumed an energy drink containing alcohol earlier in the evening with friends. He was reportedly feeling sick, and his friends said he had vomited twice when his mother’s fiance came to pick him up. During the ride home, he reportedly removed his seat belt and opened the car door, while the car was in motion, in order to vomit again. He fell out and was struck by a Ford Explorer. Police have said they will not file charges against the driver of the Explorer.</p>

<p>Initial news reports indicated that the boys were drinking Four Loko, an alcoholic beverage once marketed as an energy drink. Subsequent reports from the Associated Press said that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/20/md-teen-dies-after-fallin_n_1289509.html" target="_blank">it was not clear</a> exactly what drink they were consuming. Police were also not sure who provided them with the drinks, although they suspect an adult in the neighborhood. Truluck’s mother has stated that she believes the drink caused her son’s death by making him so ill that he lost control of his actions. She told the Baltimore Sun that she believes he was so sick because of the drink that he was not aware of anything except the need to vomit. She is now speaking out against underage drinking.</p>

<p>The beverage marketed as “Four Loko” has already had a <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/302331/20120221/teenager-dies-drinking-four-loko-alcoholic-energy.htm" target="_blank">controversial history</a>. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued warnings that mixing caffeine or other chemicals often used in energy drinks with alcohol posed a number of health risks. It can prevent a person from full awareness of their own intoxication because the caffeine or other supplement masks the direct effect of the alcohol, but the person is nevertheless impaired. The FDA called this a “wide-awake drunk” effect. Four Loko’s manufacturer, Phusion Projects, reportedly reformulated the drink in 2010 to remove caffeine, but it continued to include alcohol in the formula. Some states banned the sale of the drinks when several college students died after allegedly consuming Four Loko.</p>

<p>The family of a teenager in the D.C. area who died in a car accident after allegedly drinking Four Loko <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-05-19/news/ct-biz-0520-four-loko-lawsuit-20110519_1_maker-of-four-loko-phusion-projects-caffeine" target="_blank">filed suit against Phusion</a> in 2011 fro wrongful death, alleging that the company was negligent in producing a drink that “desensitizes users to the symptoms of intoxication,” thus increasing the risk of injury. His death occurred a few weeks before Phusion announced its reformulation.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The family could have a claim against a manufacturer of a drink that combines caffeine and alcohol for a form of products liability. Since the FDA had concluded that energy drinks with alcohol pose a health risk, a manufacturer could face liability for a design or manufacturing defect in its product. By creating a product that it know has the potential to cause harm, the manufacturer could theoretically be liable for injuries suffered by a person who consumes the drink, or even for injuries caused by that person. In the cases described here, the damages would be for wrongful death, based on the allegation that the effects of the drink caused the teens’ deaths.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1064340.html">Maryland personal injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people injured due to faulty or defective products. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/12/maryland_court_strikes_down_st_1.html">Maryland Court Strikes Down State Lead Paint Law</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, December 12, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/11/maryland_teen_burned_by_paint_1.html">Maryland Teen Burned by Paint Can Thrown into Campfire</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, November 10, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.washingtondcinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/05/dc_area_teens_family_files_wro.html">DC Area Teen’s Family Files Wrongful Death Lawsuit Against Four Loko Manufacturer</a>, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, May 30, 2011</p>

<p>Photo credit: <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1144226" target="_blank">'mean bean'</a> by <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/profile/dotlizard" target="_blank">KD Kelly</a> on <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/" target="_blank">stock.xchng</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Family of Maryland Man Who Died in Police Custody Dismisses Suit Against Police, May Still Sue Hospital</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/02/family_of_maryland_man_who_die.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1918" title="Family of Maryland Man Who Died in Police Custody Dismisses Suit Against Police, May Still Sue Hospital" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1918</id>
    
    <published>2012-02-27T20:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-27T20:01:08Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Police went to the Greenbelt, Maryland home of Lynda Sheppard on the morning of May 26, 2010 with an arrest warrant for her son, Michael Mang. Sheppard had a protection order against her 41 year-old son and had requested a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Medical Malpractice" />
            <category term="Police Brutality" />
            <category term="Wrongful Death" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="449966_49903379_02272012.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/449966_49903379_02272012.jpg" title="'handcuff' by Andreas Herrmann on stock.xchng" align="right" width="300" height="114" />Police went to the Greenbelt, Maryland home of Lynda Sheppard on the morning of May 26, 2010 with an arrest warrant for her son, Michael Mang. Sheppard had a protection order against her 41 year-old son and had requested a warrant for his arrest, saying he had threatened and assaulted her. Police arrested Mang, and <a href="http://greenbelt.patch.com/articles/after-mang-dies-in-police-clash-blood-test-shows-alcohol-only" target="_blank">hours later he was dead</a>.</p>

<p>Police allegedly entered Sheppard’s house that morning, woke Mang, and then hit him and tasered him. Mang reportedly suffered bruising, a broken nose, and a broken rib.</p>

<p>Police took Mang to the hospital, where he was reportedly alert and cooperative. After several hours, though, Mang began to complain of chest pains and allegedly requested a cardiac examination. Instead, the hospital allegedly released him to police. He was reportedly held at the hospital from 5:37 a.m. to 9:20 a.m., when police took custody of him and took him to the police station. They found him lying unconscious in the station’s processing area at about 9:55 a.m. and returned him to the hospital. He was reportedly pronounced dead at the hospital at around 10:46 a.m.</p>

<p>An investigation by the medical examiner found evidence of alcohol consumption, but no drugs. They also found marks on his lower back that resembled taser marks. The medical examiner concluded that Mang died of natural causes stemming from a heart condition. He reportedly had a coronary blockage that raised suspicion of a heart attack.</p>

<p>Sheppard filed a federal lawsuit in July 2011 against the city of Greenbelt, alleging that the arresting officers caused Mang’s death by using unnecessary and unreasonable force in arresting him. The petition detailed Mang’s injuries and the timeline of events leading up to his death. She demanded $10 million in damages.</p>

<p>The city denied any connection between Mang’s injuries and his death. An internal police investigation concluded that the arresting officers used appropriate force against Mang because he fought back. The city’s attorney told the Greenbelt Patch that Mang’s injuries could simply have been the result of fighting with police.</p>

<p>Sheppard <a href="http://greenbelt.patch.com/articles/mang-family-dismisses-lawsuit-against-city-and-police" target="_blank">dismissed the lawsuit</a> without prejudice on February 15, 2012. “Without prejudice” means that she can re-file the claim within the original statute of limitations. The Greenbelt police chief described the suit as frivolous and said that the internal investigation vindicated the city’s defense to the suit, that Mang’s injuries at the hands of police did not cause his death.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Sheppard has stated that she may file suit for wrongful death against the hospital that treated Mang. She must first submit the case to an <a href="http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/25ind/html/42healcf.html" target="_blank">arbitration panel</a> that considers any Maryland medical malpractice claims over $25,000.</p>

<p>This case involves two possible theories of causation: negligence or intentional tortious conduct by police, and medical malpractice. Police have a duty to use reasonable force in carrying out their duties, and the law allows people injured due to unnecessary use of force to claim damages from the police. Doctors have a duty to provide safe and diligent medical care, and they are held to a very high standard under the law. If Mang’s death resulted from a failure to perform requested cardiac tests, rather than injuries sustained during his arrest, then the hospital could be liable.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063424.html">Maryland personal injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people injured due to the negligence or illegal acts of others. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/01/legislator_awarded_50000_in_su_1.html">Legislator Awarded $50,000 in Suit for Damages Caused by Tight Handcuffs</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, January 2, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/08/federal_lawsuit_against_ice_ac.html">Federal Lawsuit Against ICE Accuses Anne Arundel County Police of Police Brutality During 2008 Immigration Raid in Maryland</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, August 11, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/03/10m_montgomery_county_wrongful.html">$10M Montgomery County Wrongful Death Lawsuit Accuses Police of Excessive Use of Force</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, March 29, 2011</p>

<p>Photo credit: <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/449966" target="_blank">'handcuff'</a> by <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/profile/andimedia" target="_blank">Andreas Herrmann</a> on <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/" target="_blank">stock.xchng</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Four Die in Car Crash in Anne Arundel County, Maryland</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/02/four_die_in_car_crash_in_anne.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1910" title="Four Die in Car Crash in Anne Arundel County, Maryland" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1910</id>
    
    <published>2012-02-20T20:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-20T21:29:06Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A tragic head-on collision in the early hours of Saturday, January 28 took the lives of four people on a highway south of Crofton, Maryland. A Chrysler Sebring sedan driven by a 19 year-old with two teenage passengers was heading...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Car Accidents" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a title="By MsCrof at en.wikipedia[see page for license], from Wikimedia Commons" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ACrofton_Parkway_spring.JPG" target="_blank"><img width="256" alt="Crofton Parkway spring" align="right" title="Crofton Parkway spring by MsCrof at en.wikipedia[see page for license], from Wikimedia Commons" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Crofton_Parkway_spring.JPG/256px-Crofton_Parkway_spring.JPG"/></a>A tragic head-on collision in the early hours of Saturday, January 28 <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/fiery-crash-kills-four-on-anne-arundel-highway/2012/01/29/gIQAHMS6aQ_story.html" target="_blank">took the lives of four people on a highway south of Crofton, Maryland</a>. A Chrysler Sebring sedan driven by a 19 year-old with two teenage passengers was heading the wrong way on eastbound U.S. 50. The recent high school graduates were going home after a birthday party. A BMW driven by a 55 year-old warehouse manager was going east on the same road. Its driver was also going home after dinner with friends in Virginia. The cars collided at about 3:30 a.m., causing the Sebring to catch fire. The three teenagers were pronounced dead at the scene, apparently dying on impact. The other driver died in the ambulance and was pronounced dead at the hospital.</p>

<p>Investigators think the Sebring may have <a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/breaking/bs-md-ar-fatal-crash-arundel-20120129,0,1087733.story" target="_blank">crossed a median to turn around or taken an exit ramp the wrong way</a> in order to head west in the eastbound lane. This suggests that they were going the wrong way for almost five miles before the crash. Multiple other drivers reportedly called 911 in the moments before the crash to report a car going the wrong way on the highway. At least one 911 caller suggested that the driver did not know she was going the wrong way after he <a href="http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2012/01/31/toxicology-reports-says-alcohol-played-a-factor-in-wrong-way-car-crash-accident/" target="_blank">narrowly avoided colliding with the car</a>.</p>

<p>A <a href="http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-02-01/news/bal-both-drivers-drunk-in-arundel-crash-that-killed-four-20120201_1_arundel-crash-accident-reports-today" target="_blank">preliminary toxicology report</a> released on January 31 showed that both drivers had blood alcohol content (BAC) above the legal limit of .08 percent, although police did not state the precise amount found in the tests. Police also said they found a small quantity of marijuana in the teens’ car. Police still have not issued any statements as to the reason why the Sebring was traveling the wrong way on Route 50 or how it got into that lane.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Liability for the crash seems straightforward, since one car was traveling the wrong way with a driver allegedly under the influence. The fact that the other driver might have also been driving under the influence could mitigate fault somewhat, but probably not much. It remains to be seen if anyone will make a claim for wrongful death over the accident.</p>

<p>Some states allow for a business or individual to be held liable for a drunk driving accident if they served alcohol to the driver when the driver was visibly intoxicated. These are known as “dram shop laws,” their rationale being that a bar or social host who provides alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person should bear some responsibility for damage that person causes. Maryland law, however does not allow for any sort of dram shop liability. Any claim for damages over this accident would be difficult, as it would amount to one estate suing another estate without witnesses.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063420.html">Maryland accident injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people injured in automobile accidents on Maryland roads. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/01/maryland_traffic_cameras_seek_1.html">Maryland Traffic Cameras Seek to Deter Speeding, Promote Safe Driving</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, January 23, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/09/two_senior_citizens_killed_in_1.html">Two Senior Citizens Killed in Benedict, Maryland, Car Accident</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, September 20, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/09/reduction_in_car_accident_fata_1.html">Reduction in Car Accident Fatalities Among 16 Year-Olds Matched by Rise Among 18 Year-Olds</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, September 16, 2011</p>

<p>Photo credit: Crofton Parkway spring by MsCrof at en.wikipedia[see page for license], <a href='http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ACrofton_Parkway_spring.JPG' target="_blank">from Wikimedia Commons</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Paralyzed Construction Worker Receives One of the Largest Workers&apos; Compensation Settlements in History After a Long Fight</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/02/paralyzed_construction_worker.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1905" title="Paralyzed Construction Worker Receives One of the Largest Workers' Compensation Settlements in History After a Long Fight" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1905</id>
    
    <published>2012-02-13T20:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-14T15:11:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A former Pennsylvania road worker who was paralyzed by a drunk driver as he directed traffic has reached a workers’ compensation settlement agreement for $3 million. This is believed to be one of the largest settlements in the U.S. In...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Insurance Disagreement" />
            <category term="Pedestrian Accident" />
            <category term="Spinal Cord Injuries" />
            <category term="Workers&apos; Compensation" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="622729_52924098_02142012.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/622729_52924098_02142012.jpg" title="'Road Work Ahead 2' by ricohman on stock.xchng" align="right" width="300" height="225" />A former Pennsylvania road worker who was paralyzed by a drunk driver as he directed traffic has reached a workers’ compensation settlement agreement for $3 million. This is believed to be one of the largest settlements in the U.S. In getting to this point, he has also gone through a Dram Shop Act lawsuit and a bad faith insurance claim.</p>

<p>Joseph Tuski was directing traffic on January 17, 2001 in Warminster, Pennsylvania. At about 10:30 a.m., a car driven by Michael Petaccio struck him. Petaccio reportedly sped around a line of cars Tuski had stopped, hitting Tuski and throwing him about sixty feet. The accident rendered Tuski a quadriplegic, and he must spend the rest of his life in a wheelchair with 24-hour care. Petaccio had reportedly just left the Ivyland Cafe, a bar in Warminster owned by Petaccio’s family where Petaccio was the manager. Petaccio pleaded no contest to driving under the influence and aggravated assault later that year, and he was sentenced to three years in prison but received work release.</p>

<p>Tuski first filed suit against Petaccio and the Ivyland Cafe, claiming <a href="http://sci.rutgers.edu/forum/archive/index.php/t-9967.html" target="_blank">negligence and Dram Shop Act liability</a>. Dram Shop Acts hold businesses who serve alcohol to visibly intoxicated individuals liable for damages subsequently caused due to that person’s intoxication. Tuski presented evidence that, at the time, he had $1.6 million in medical bills and future medical expenses of at least 12 million. A Philadelphia jury awarded Tuski an enormous but largely symbolic verdict in 2004 totalling $75.6 million in damages. This included $50.6 million in compensatory and $25 million in punitive damages, but neither defendant had the ability to pay such an amount. Petaccio only had $100,000 in liability insurance coverage, while The Ivyland Cafe had coverage of $1 million.</p>

<p>After the verdict, the bar lost its appeal, although a judge cut the jury’s award in half. The bar’s insurer then reportedly refused to pay the policy limits of the award. Tuski sued the insurance company for <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/local&id=5434566" target="_blank">bad faith refusal to pay a claim</a>. Although a plaintiff in an injury case has no direct relationship with a defendant’s insurer, since the insurance company’s obligation to pay is based on a contractual relationship with the defendant, many states allow a plaintiff to pursue an insurer for payment of a specific award. In this case, the bar assigned its rights under its insurance contract to Tuski. In June 2007, Tuski <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/east/2007/07/02/81374.htm" target="_blank">reached a settlement with the insurance company</a> for $20 million.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Tuski has now also settled his claim against his former employer, Liberty Construction, and its insurance carrier. In December 2011, he announced that a workers’ compensation judge had approved a <a href="http://www.timesherald.com/article/20111216/NEWS01/111219712&pager=full_story" target="_blank">$3 million settlement with the insurance carrier</a>. The settlement, reached in October 2011, may be one of the largest workers’ compensation settlements ever.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063436.html">Maryland accident injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen are skilled at pursuing justice for people injured in automobile accidents on Maryland roads. <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">Contact us</a> today online or at (800) 654-1949 for a free and confidential consultation.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2008/04/maryland_welder_awarded_3_mill.html">Maryland Welder Awarded $3 Million for Crushed Leg Injury</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, April 29, 2008</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2008/01/window_washer_who_fell_47_stor.html">Window Washer Who Fell 47 Stories Will File Personal Injury Lawsuit</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, January 4, 2008</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2007/04/investigators_look_at_fatal_mi.html">Investigators Look At Fatal Mine Accident That Killed Two Miners In Barton, Maryland</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, April 25, 2007</p>

<p>Photo credit: <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/622729" target="_blank">'Road Work Ahead 2'</a> by <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/profile/ricohman" target="_blank">ricohman</a> on <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/" target="_blank">stock.xchng</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Medical Malpractice: A Surgeon&apos;s Perspective</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/02/medical_malpractice_a_surgeons.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1900" title="Medical Malpractice: A Surgeon's Perspective" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1900</id>
    
    <published>2012-02-06T20:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-09T04:41:38Z</updated>
    
    <summary>An article in a recent issue of General Surgery News, a trade publication for surgeries, examines the impact of medical malpractice litigation on general surgeons and several specialty areas of surgery. The article looks at recent statistics and discusses the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Medical Malpractice" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="1051476_74068952_02082012.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/1051476_74068952_02082012.jpg" align="right" title="'Woman in hospital' by tizwas01 on stock.xchng" width="300" height="400" />An article in a recent issue of <em>General Surgery News</em>, a trade publication for surgeries, examines <a href="http://www.generalsurgerynews.com/ViewArticle.aspx?d=In+the+News&d_id=69&i=December+2011&i_id=797&a_id=19771" target="_blank">the impact of medical malpractice litigation on general surgeons</a> and several specialty areas of surgery. The article looks at recent statistics and discusses the merits of fighting malpractice lawsuits versus settling them quickly. It concludes that doctors are usually better off, in the long run, fighting lawsuits. The analysis tends not to be favorable towards medical malpractice plaintiffs and their <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043697.html">attorneys</a>, but it does offer a good glimpse of how surgeons might approach a malpractice claim.</p>

<p>A recent survey by the American Medical Association reportedly found that five percent of respondents had faced a malpractice claim of some sort during the previous year. Another study published in the <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> in 2011 found that, after neurosurgeons and thoracic surgeons, general surgeons have the next-highest rate of malpractice claims. The study reviewed twenty-four surgical specialties. In an average year, it found that 15.3% of general surgeons will have at least one claim brought against them.</p>

<p>Doctors rarely have the exclusive authority to decide whether to settle a case, as a doctor’s malpractice insurance carrier will typically handle the expense of legal representation. The author of the article advises surgeons against settling in most cases. He notes that, first and foremost, settlement can be interpreted as an admission of fault, even if the settlement’s purpose is to avoid even costlier litigation. Many settlement agreements include a clause specifying that the defendant does not admit liability, but settlement agreements do not get publicity beyond the parties to a dispute. Settling a lawsuit can also lead to problems further down the road, as the board of medicine of a doctor’s state may wish to review the matter itself, and the doctor’s name may appear in databases that catalog malpractice claims.</p>

<p>Of particular note to <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/">personal injury attorneys</a> is the discussion of how surgeons can avoid lawsuits. There is little to no correlation, the article states, between the degree of risk in a surgical procedure and the rate of malpractice claims. In other words, riskier procedures are not necessarily at the greatest of a claim. Rather, it is a matter of the doctor’s relationship with the patients and the patient’s family. The better the communication between patient and doctor, the less likely the patient is to claim malpractice.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Surgeons can therefore protect themselves as best they can against lawsuits by encouraging communication with their patients. This is good advice for patients as well as doctors. A crucial component of a doctor-patient relationship is the presence of informed consent. This means that a doctor has informed the patient of the nature of the treatment and all of the risks reasonably associated with it, and that the patient understands the treatment and the risks and has consented to the treatment. Patients and doctors alike should document all steps of communication. For patients who do have a complaint, it can help establish what a doctor did or did not tell the patient.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063424.html">Maryland injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen represent the rights of people who have suffered injury from malpractice by medical professionals. To schedule a free and confidential consultation, <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">contact us</a> online or at (800) 654-1949.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/01/dentist_pleads_guilty_to_medic_1.html">Dentist Pleads Guilty to Medicaid Fraud, Using Paper Clips Instead of Dental Supplies</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, January 30, 2012</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/12/when_a_never_event_occurs_at_a.html">When a "Never Event" Occurs at a Hospital, It Frequently Goes Unreported</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, December 5, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2011/11/outsourcing_of_radiology_raise_1.html">Outsourcing of Radiology Raises Concerns About Quality of Care</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, November 3, 2011</p>

<p>Photo credit: <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1051476" target="_blank">'Woman in hospital'</a> by <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/profile/tizwas01" target="_blank">tizwas01</a> on <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/" target="_blank">stock.xchng</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Dentist Pleads Guilty to Medicaid Fraud, Using Paper Clips Instead of Dental Supplies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2012/01/dentist_pleads_guilty_to_medic_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1886" title="Dentist Pleads Guilty to Medicaid Fraud, Using Paper Clips Instead of Dental Supplies" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com,2012://1.1886</id>
    
    <published>2012-01-30T18:23:38Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-31T18:39:50Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A former Massachusetts dentist, Michael Clair, pleaded guilty to Medicaid fraud and a number of other charges stemming from allegations that he used paper clips while performing root canals instead of the stainless steel posts normally used. He will serve...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lebowitz &amp; Mzhen</name>
        <uri>http://www.imlawfirm.com/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Medical Malpractice" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="33199_8447_01302012.jpg" src="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/33199_8447_01302012.jpg" title="dentist by piotr on stock.xchng" align="right" width="300" height="240" />A former Massachusetts dentist, Michael Clair, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46114848/ns/health-health_care/#.TybTQIEU_fS" target="_blank">pleaded guilty to Medicaid fraud and a number of other charges</a> stemming from allegations that he used paper clips while performing root canals instead of the stainless steel posts normally used. He will <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/30/dentist-who-used-paper-clips-sentneced_n_1241652.html" target="_blank">serve one year in jail</a>. Medicaid reportedly suspended the 53 year-old dentist in 2002, but he continued to file claims under different names belonging to other dentists in his practice until 2005. Massachusetts suspended Clair’s dentistry license in 2006, and he is reportedly not currently licensed to practice in any state. He has resided in Maryland for several years.</p>

<p>Numerous patients also reported infections, pain, and other problems stemming from his treatments. One patient, a teenager, had to have his tooth removed after a root canal performed by Clair in 2005. The tooth turned black and caused him severe pain. The teen’s mother claimed that Clair also performed shoddy dental work on her other children.</p>

<p>Prosecutors accused him of defrauding Medicaid of around $130,000 for his claims made using other dentists’ names. They also charged him with assault and battery in connection with his root canal procedures and other practices, illegally prescribing medications, and witness intimidation. Clair reportedly pleaded guilty to all or most of the charges. Prosecutors had asked the court for a sentence of five to seven years. The judge sentenced him to one year in prison, citing Clair’s guilty plea and willingness to accept responsibility, his lack of a prior criminal history, and “certain mental health issues.” The judge did not elaborate on that last factor. Clair will serve his sentence at the Bristol County House of Correction in North Dartmouth, Massachusetts.</p>

<p>Clair’s use of paper clips in root canals is a particularly egregious breach of the trust placed in dentists by the law and by society in general. Dentists, just like medical doctors and other medical professionals, undergo a considerable amount of training and education. As a result, they are entrusted with a great deal of responsibility over their patients. A dentist has a duty to provide diligent and competent service to all his or her patients, and to obtain informed consent for all treatments and procedures. A root canal, known more formally as endodontic therapy, is a complicated procedure. Few laypeople understand how the procedure works, and tend to trust dentists to perform the work. Using common items like paper clips in the procedure in place of specially-designed materials intended for the procedure puts patients at unreasonable risk of infection and worse. This is a clear breach of a dentist’s duty of care.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In Maryland, the <a href="http://www.dhmh.maryland.gov/dental/SitePages/Home.aspx" target="_blank">State Board of Dental Examiners</a> regulates the practice of dentistry. This includes overseeing licenses and handling complaints. People injured when a dentist provides substandard care may also be entitled to recover damages in the civil court system under a medical malpractice claim.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1063424.html">Maryland injury lawyers</a> at Lebowitz & Mzhen represent the rights of people who have suffered injury from malpractice by medical professionals. To schedule a free and confidential consultation, <a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyer.net/lawyer-attorney-1043687.html">contact us</a> online or at (800) 654-1949.</p>

<p><strong>More Blog Posts:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.washingtondcinjurylawyerblog.com/2011/12/washington_dc_dentist_warns_of.html">Washington DC Dentist Warns of Dangers of Sports Injuries</a>, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, December 14, 2011</p>

<p><a href="http://www.washingtondcinjurylawyerblog.com/2009/10/medical_malpractice_survivors.html">Medical Malpractice Survivors and Families Travel to Washington DC to Stand for Personal Injury Victims' Rights</a>, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, October 26, 2009</p>

<p><a href="http://www.marylandaccidentlawblog.com/2007/10/19yearold_student_sues_howard.html">19-Year-Old Student Sues Howard University Hospital, GW Hospital, and Washington D.C. for Medical Malpractice and Negligence</a>, Maryland Accident Law Blog, October 23, 2007</p>

<p>Photo credit: <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/33199" target="_blank">dentist</a> by <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/profile/piotr" target="_blank">piotr</a> on <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/" target="_blank">stock.xchng</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 


